Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language
Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> Thu, 29 November 2007 13:18 UTC
Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1IxjHR-0004ra-4S; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:18:13 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1IxjHQ-0004rQ-DI for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org;
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:18:12 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxjHP-0004pi-VN
for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:18:11 -0500
Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.175])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxjHN-0001v7-Kl
for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:18:11 -0500
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) by exprod7ob111.postini.com
([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:18:03 PST
Received: from magenta.juniper.net ([172.17.27.123]) by emailsmtp56.jnpr.net
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:18:02 -0800
Received: from idle.juniper.net (idleski.juniper.net [172.25.4.26])
by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id lATDI1E01926;
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:18:01 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from phil@idle.juniper.net)
Received: from idle.juniper.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by idle.juniper.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lATDEklv047248;
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:14:46 GMT (envelope-from phil@idle.juniper.net)
Message-Id: <200711291314.lATDEklv047248@idle.juniper.net>
To: "Rohan Mahy" <rohan.mahy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language
In-reply-to: <953beacc0711282017p3ad865abw19920b4e68e82e80@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:14:45 -0500
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2007 13:18:02.0739 (UTC)
FILETIME=[452B2430:01C8328A]
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Cc: yang@ietf.org, discuss@apps.ietf.org, NETCONF Goes On <ngo@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols
<discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>,
<mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>,
<mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org
"Rohan Mahy" writes: >The W3C no longer uses XSD because it is an absolutely awful PITA. Are you saying that w3c has stopped using xsd? Can you point me to a reference for that? Thanks, Phil
- Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Andy Bierman
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Rohan Mahy
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Phil Shafer
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Rohan Mahy
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Chris Cross
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Phil Shafer
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Martin Bjorklund
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Andy Bierman
- Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language David Harrington
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Balazs Lengyel
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Jon Saperia
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Balazs Lengyel
- Re: Why NETCONF needs a data modeling language Jon Saperia