Re: Position papers due Dec 14

Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU> Wed, 19 December 2007 17:39 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J52tY-0000UU-4K; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:39:48 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J2san-0005hg-W3 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:15:29 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2san-0005hP-79 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:15:29 -0500
Received: from kiwi.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.19]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2sak-00047X-Re for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:15:29 -0500
Received: from [131.179.33.196] (Cs-33-196.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.33.196]) by kiwi.cs.ucla.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/UCLACS-6.0) with ESMTP id lBDIFPhh009359; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:15:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <761895B3-653F-4F15-BAA5-8528ACC62617@osafoundation.org>
References: <F7CF3E83-FD69-454F-8E17-491834C65F56@osafoundation.org> <761895B3-653F-4F15-BAA5-8528ACC62617@osafoundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <F2170735-9B8C-451C-AF2C-2814F77FCB65@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Position papers due Dec 14
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:15:29 -0800
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:39:46 -0500
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@sun.com>, IAB IAB <iab@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

On Dec 13, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> Remember brief position papers should be sent to Chris and me and/ 
> or the Apps Discuss list by end of day (anywhere) Dec 14.
>
> thanks!
> Lisa
>
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 11 and 12, there will be an Applications Area Architecture  
>> workshop somewhere in the Bay Area.

I just noticed that this runs into conflict with E2E RG meeting in  
Boston (Feb 12-13), but hopefully there is little, if any,  overlap  
between the participants of the two meetings.


>>   We hope to nail down a venue once we've got a better idea of  
>> attendance.  We are going to look for a host, but if there are a  
>> few expenses not covered, we may ask for a few 100$ attendance  
>> fee.  If we need to charge a small fee we'll ask in advance of the  
>> actual meeting.
>>
>> Position papers are required of all attendees by Dec 14.  These  
>> should be a few pages of text on some topic related to  
>> Applications area architectural issues.  Since the group of  
>> attendees is expected to span HTTP and AtomPub, email, IM,  
>> calendaring, directories and more, issues should be of interest to  
>> more than one of these groups.  Some existing Applications  
>> architecture "modules" that already are reused  include SASL,  
>> URLs, MIME types, XML and XML schemas and namespaces, HTTP as a  
>> substrate, TLS, ABNF, BEEP.
>>
>> A position paper could describe a problem or make a proposal to  
>> solve a problem.  The paper could be a prelude to an I-D of any  
>> kind or to a WG charter, or might simply educate and persuade.  An  
>> ideal position paper would seed new work or make progress towards  
>> solving a problem that would benefit Apps protocol designers,  
>> implementors or users.
>>
>> Participants may send position papers directly to Lisa and Chris,  
>> although you can send position papers directly to the Apps Discuss  
>> list (we'll be circulating the papers publicly anyway).
>>
>> Since the due date for papers is Dec 14, if you'd like to flesh  
>> out an idea, the Vancouver IETF meeting might be a handy place to  
>> grab people and do so.
>>
>> In advance of Dec 14, we'd still appreciate early RSVPs.
>>
>> Lisa
>>
>>
>
>