draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 11 October 2007 15:18 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifzo6-0002cM-00; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:18:38 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifzo4-0002cC-N4 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:18:36 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifzo4-0002by-DR for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:18:36 -0400
Received: from ns.jck.com ([209.187.148.211] helo=bs.jck.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifzo3-0006Ju-6h for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:18:36 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=p3.JCK.COM) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ifznz-000EJ0-FM for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:18:31 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:18:30 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: discuss@apps.ietf.org
Subject: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06
Message-ID: <ED32E78A8A1DB13EA0EFBA31@p3.JCK.COM>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Hi.

This draft has been posted, incorporating suggested changes from
Frank, Clive, one problem that I spotted, and a comments
received offlist, all of which I think are minor.

I think we have reached the point of diminishing returns and
that, unless someone suddenly sees a showstopper, it is time for
us to ask Chris and Lisa to issue an IETF Last Call.

Anyone see showstoppers or disagree for some other reason?

     john