IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617

"Robert Sayre" <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 31 May 2007 21:39 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtsMg-0007dw-OS; Thu, 31 May 2007 17:39:26 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Htl1n-0006wI-H4 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 09:49:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htl1l-0006pf-LN for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 09:49:22 -0400
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htl1k-0008DL-Em for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 09:49:21 -0400
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id y77so329962pyg for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N5KjkuiSPlFnbrWSKAGqJKiVcyi/erNoCm1Q5cWkdSqXUUiwVVxz2bVcUE1jQCeW2ryUZkMVkolvWjWKmG8U0JzidR+nq4tDiG4trGRJ86EYp8VpjXQRl5LAr0PlvYEos3ioGSaC8aQR9k+/0ZkyagDtlHoLYGyEjLpv2+bEKwM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MVgR2o2hh+FHkAOr41FAS2GrAsu6A5C8fQ0kDdbvRy1xI4B8ywS/sxQp0RJTpSyzub39DZLiCwTQKAPC9rPNS0a/WVRTIVYDhSyL8S4XmGJE9AMZbbi0CVBFO58p6uYKtATmKzs4YuOT9aKSAyidMMXAxTQv0ihZUoKrNn5pjFk=
Received: by 10.115.49.16 with SMTP id b16mr598516wak.1180619359077; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.211.7 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <68fba5c50705310649i418f14c6g21d0f0c669ffa692@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:49:19 -0400
From: "Robert Sayre" <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: "Cyrus Daboo" <cyrus@daboo.name>
Subject: Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617
In-Reply-To: <AF50DDD797FD9753B3C31D92@ninevah.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <BA772834-227A-4C1B-9534-070C50DF05B3@mnot.net> <392C98BA-E7B8-44ED-964B-82FC48162924@mnot.net> <p06240843c2833f4d7f2f@10.20.30.108> <465D9142.9050506@gmx.de> <465D987F.5070906@cisco.com> <C1E6F3CB-49C6-4C0F-955A-3D69D26987C6@mnot.net> <000c01c7a318$7bc243e0$7346cba0$@org> <E21FCD3A-D51A-4C06-B46D-3EA3ED54592B@mnot.net> <68fba5c50705302228v7f8ab278y50cf38c9f971f0a3@mail.gmail.com> <AF50DDD797FD9753B3C31D92@ninevah.local>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:39:23 -0400
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

On 5/31/07, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> --On May 31, 2007 1:28:39 AM -0400 Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My feeling is that the current schemes can be updated by documenting
> > the internationalization behavior of popular implementations, but
> > nothing else is worth doing.
>
> I disagree. I think we need to go a lot further. My suggestion would be to
> throw away 2617 as-is,
...
> So I think separate working
> groups would be better because of the different cross-area participation
> requirements.

Fully agree. I should have written "no other work on 2617 is worth doing".


-- 

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email