Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt
Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com> Wed, 05 December 2007 22:39 UTC
Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J02tv-00013c-97; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:39:31 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J02tu-00013P-89 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:39:30 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J02tt-000139-UV for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:39:29 -0500
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J02tt-0004Ej-Ha for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:39:29 -0500
Received: from totoro.qualcomm.com (totoro.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.158]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id lB5MdS9X009496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:39:28 -0800
Received: from dhcp-407d.ietf70.org (vpn-10-50-16-21.qualcomm.com [10.50.16.21]) by totoro.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id lB5MdQXv007606; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:39:27 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240603c37cd717abe1@dhcp-407d.ietf70.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071204162040.GB19161@nic.fr>
References: <E1It5KL-00032t-Up@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <20071203094351.GA19449@nic.fr> <p06240617c37a7970893b@dhcp-407d.ietf70.org> <20071204162040.GB19161@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
X-message-flag: Warning: Outlook in use. Upgrade to Eudora: <http://www.eudora.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:36:00 -0800
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Dave Cridland <dave.cridland@isode.com>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org
At 5:20 PM +0100 12/4/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 07:45:47PM -0800, > Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com> wrote > a message of 95 lines which said: > >> Currently, subaddressing is mostly part of the mostly undocumented >> email lore that some implementers are aware of while others are not. > > And that's the right way: subaddressing does not have to be > documented, it is a local convention. Even as a local convention, it is helpful to have a document that describes it. > (How can you tell if > bortzmeyer@nic.fr is not an address with subaddressing and "m" as the > delimiter?) Only the recipient's environment needs to know. I certainly don't need to know if I'm sending you email if the particular address I have for you is subaddressed. At present, the document does contain text about list servers recognizing subaddressing. This is the one area where I'm not convinced. I can see the benefit, but I think that once we allow for anything that isn't after final delivery knowing about subaddressing, at that point we have changed it from a purely local convention to one that does indeed have meaning elsewhere, and we pretty much are then forced to choose a single (or maybe two) character for the delimiter. Because of this, I am wavering as to if we should mention list servers or not. -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly-selected tag: --------------- The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. --Andrew S. Tanenbaum
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Randall Gellens
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Bill McQuillan
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt der Mouse
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Dave Cridland
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt der Mouse
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Dave Cridland
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Tony Finch
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Keith Moore
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Dave Cridland
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Randall Gellens
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Randall Gellens
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Randall Gellens
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt der Mouse
- Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt Dave Cridland