IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtSuE-0008Qy-DK; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:28:22 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HtSuD-0008Qq-DJ for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:28:21 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtSuD-0008Qi-3Y for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:28:21 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtSuB-0005mK-Mc for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:28:21 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 May 2007 18:28:18 -0000
Received: from p508F99AB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.153.171] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 30 May 2007 20:28:18 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18wwIMCifgwHB01r7G8F2QOrT+vk+/lNgswoRRW/X Er6QSHmCoOliDQ
Message-ID: <465DC23D.6050303@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:28:13 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis
References: <BA772834-227A-4C1B-9534-070C50DF05B3@mnot.net> <392C98BA-E7B8-44ED-964B-82FC48162924@mnot.net> <p06240843c2833f4d7f2f@[10.20.30.108]> <465D9142.9050506@gmx.de> <465D987F.5070906@cisco.com> <465DAE5B.2070605@cs.utk.edu>
In-Reply-To: <465DAE5B.2070605@cs.utk.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Keith Moore wrote:
> ...
> IMHO, the first work item of httpbis should be a defect list for http
> 1.1 and associated documents.    The next step would be to assess which

Preparations have started for this at 
<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/>.

> ...

Best regards, Julian

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email