Re: I-D Action:draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt

Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> Tue, 19 February 2008 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E919928C667; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:18:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.405
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.844, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSTmOBbPDNi5; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D7C28C613; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:18:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BA228C614 for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:18:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g-pZ1EII82BF for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA22228C613 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1AF06203C0; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:18:01 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-a91fcbb000000b15-fc-47bb0138e5fa
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id EA74320093; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:18:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.171]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:18:00 +0100
Received: from [159.107.197.224] ([159.107.197.224]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:18:00 +0100
Message-ID: <47BB0137.6050600@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:17:59 +0100
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
References: <6.0.0.20.2.20080218203629.058cf7c0@localhost> <048BF0AB-6FCB-411B-AD4B-726DF8B13B08@osafoundation.org> <47B9D5F5.3020808@gmx.de> <9A910F0F-7930-4D84-A0A8-46FE86A6618E@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <9A910F0F-7930-4D84-A0A8-46FE86A6618E@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2008 16:18:00.0340 (UTC) FILETIME=[FEE9CD40:01C87312]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, IANA <iana@iana.org>, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM>
X-BeenThere: discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Hello,
In Netconf we will be using quite a bit of URIs soon. IF Netconf becomes the roaring success we 
believe in :-) we will use one URI for every standard management model (kind of MIB).
Balazs

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> Details:
>   http://www.w3.org/blog/systeam/2008/02/08/w3c_s_excessive_dtd_traffic
> 
> Personally, if I had to serve this traffic, I'd put a highly-concurrent 
> Web server (e.g., Lighttpd) in place and build a one-second+ delay into 
> serving those responses. Fine for human use, but will motivate software 
> authors to find out why things suddenly got so slow...
> 
> Beyond that, question: how many IETF specs use a namespace URI as the 
> primary means of identifying the format/protocol? As opposed to a media 
> type. My suspicion is that the number is fairly small. If that's the 
> case, I wonder if there's a need for these URIs to be resolvable.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> On 19/02/2008, at 6:01 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm adding IANA and Thomas Narten (author of IANA considerations 
>>> docs) to this thread to get early IANA feedback about this idea.  It 
>>> may well be a good idea, but we definitely want to think it through:
>>> - A registry for HTTP URLs in the IANA domain
>>>   ... including a HTML or XML document hosted by IANA on its Website 
>>> at the location specified in the registered URL
>>>  ... which means that end-users and developers will use these URIs, 
>>> perhaps very frequently
>>> What do we know about the W3 experience hosting namespace URIs with 
>>> actual documents at the URIs?  I've been hearing rumours lately about 
>>> something like this causing expensive levels of traffic, but I can't 
>>> recall the details.
>>> ...
>>
>> That was about DTDs (fetched by XML parsers), not namespace documents.
>>
>> BR, Julian
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
> 

-- 
Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
TSP System Manager
ECN: 831 7320                        Fax: +36 1 4377792
Tel: +36-1-437-7320     email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com