IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Machine Identity

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 26 February 2008 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA1428C2E4; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:28:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.157, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOWNldZgvBDb; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:28:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0EB28C396; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:28:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9F628C396 for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:28:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rlr7ZZxQMvJ for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [192.134.4.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072CA28C357 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D7F21C009F; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:27:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3799A1C0097; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:27:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AAA58E9F2; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:27:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:27:54 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Subject: Re: Machine Identity
Message-ID: <20080226142754.GA12093@nic.fr>
References: <20080226130527.GA1404@generic-nic.net> <47C4101B.6050206@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47C4101B.6050206@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:11:55PM +0100,
 Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote 
 a message of 47 lines which said:

> IMHO HIP (RFC4423) is that exact identity layer 

I feel the same way but it does not seem that HIP interests many
people?

> The big problem though is that actually getting programs to use this
> is cumbersome, simply because a lot of programmers don't know about
> it.

Via draft-ietf-hip-native-api? How many implementation? How could I
use it on a machine which has no HIP in its kernel?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email