Re: Test
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 07 February 2008 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA11F3A7AEC; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:54:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RafOtVoPXU5l; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A12A3A79B6; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:54:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E051A3A797C; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:54:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qY6VuA+X0-l; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DD23A713F; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from naturevery-lm.corp.yahoo.com (unknown [207.126.230.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0089BD05A1; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:56:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <00bd01c869ba$93689f80$0601a8c0@pc6>
Subject: Re: Test
X-Priority: 3
References: <035301c867fc$c78a2c80$0601a8c0@pc6> <00bd01c869ba$93689f80$0601a8c0@pc6>
Message-Id: <F7E7FE27-C38E-4546-AEC3-ADC9DAFB512F@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:56:04 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
Cc: discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
That seems like a bug, not a feature.. BCC:ing ietf-action... On 07/02/2008, at 10:35 AM, tom.petch wrote: > In case you were wondering what I was on about, this mailing list is > now > discuss@ietf.org > dropping the reference to apps (which confused me initially > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com> > To: <discuss@ietf.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:57 PM > Subject: Test > > >> Just trying to find where apps-discuss has gone to post- >> reorganisation. >> >> Tom Petch >> -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/