Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Thu, 07 June 2007 22:13 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwQEZ-0006NP-UY; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:13:35 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HwQEY-0006NF-Sk for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:13:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwQEY-0006N4-J0 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:13:34 -0400
Received: from shu.cs.utk.edu ([160.36.56.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwQEX-0001l3-CW for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:13:34 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shu.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DE71EE19E; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:13:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new with ClamAV and SpamAssasin at cs.utk.edu
Received: from shu.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bes.cs.utk.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqoYn6KE7bg5; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (user-119b1dm.biz.mindspring.com [66.149.133.182]) by shu.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADCA1EE152; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:13:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <466882EB.5060009@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:12:59 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis
References: <BA772834-227A-4C1B-9534-070C50DF05B3@mnot.net> <392C98BA-E7B8-44ED-964B-82FC48162924@mnot.net> <6AE049B9045C00064222693F@[10.1.110.5]> <p06240871c28dd59e7371@[10.20.30.108]> <46682DC3.2010405@cs.utk.edu> <p06240875c28df150f134@[10.20.30.108]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240875c28df150f134@[10.20.30.108]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
OpenPGP: id=E1473978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 12:09 PM -0400 6/7/07, Keith Moore wrote:
>> 2617 doesn't need clarification, it needs to be deprecated and replaced
>> with not only different schemes but an entirely different framework.
>
> We need to deal with the real world. In the real world, Basic and
> Digest Auth are used. In the real world, the better replacement for
> them is not deployed. It is fine for us to say "please stop doing
> that, use this instead", but it is myopic and unhelpful to deprecate
> something that is in widespread use.
basic and digest are used, but not widely.  deprecate means "please stop
doing that, use this instead".

Keith