Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)

Shumon Huque <shuque@isc.upenn.edu> Wed, 12 September 2007 16:50 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVVQO-0002fl-Vf; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:50:48 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IVBa0-0004u4-B9 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:39:25 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVBa0-0004th-0Y for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:39:24 -0400
Received: from talkeetna.isc-net.upenn.edu ([128.91.197.188]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVBZy-00055b-Rg for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:39:23 -0400
Received: by talkeetna.isc-net.upenn.edu (Postfix, from userid 4127) id 981A01CDC; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:39:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:39:22 -0400
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@isc.upenn.edu>
To: Paul Leach <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
Message-ID: <20070911193922.GA13450@isc.upenn.edu>
References: <46E2E54A.2050406@isode.com> <20070908205337.82EC933C39@delta.rtfm.com> <46E43BA9.3080407@isode.com> <042C7D611172EE4A98E7B9AF81D1178C7623734415@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <042C7D611172EE4A98E7B9AF81D1178C7623734415@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:50:47 -0400
Cc: "ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org" <ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org>, "discuss@apps.ietf.org" <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "saag@mit.edu" <saag@mit.edu>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:29:24PM -0700, Paul Leach wrote:
> I've read the I-D and EKR's responses, and while I don't agree with all of them I agree with enough of them that I think that the draft could use a further revision that takes them into consideration.
> 

Would someone send a pointer to Eric Rescorla's critique of the
draft? I couldn't find it, although I found comments by various 
other folks on the IETF draft tracker.

--Shumon.