Re: vCard and CardDAV strawman Charter

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 24 May 2007 08:53 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hr94I-0002ja-Vt; Thu, 24 May 2007 04:53:10 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hr94I-0002jO-1D for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 04:53:10 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hr94H-0002jG-EW for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 04:53:09 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hr94G-0005Dk-05 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 04:53:09 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 May 2007 08:46:54 -0000
Received: from p508FA1D4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.161.212] by mail.gmx.net (mp049) with SMTP; 24 May 2007 10:46:54 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/WPFE3dfPWlHlBgXeVMW2UAWw8bC6qIXUSAbhOdS REB7DAb6tfFf7C
Message-ID: <4655509E.8010903@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:45:18 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Subject: Re: vCard and CardDAV strawman Charter
References: <AFD8F8BC1C0185492E28E4AE@446E7922C82D299DB29D899F> <C019BF6AA8E2371571D627F5@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <C019BF6AA8E2371571D627F5@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> I agree that rolling up all the new properties defined in RFCs into one 
> document would be good. Also I think it would make sense to define an 
> IANA registry for properties along the lines of what iCalendar has (is) 
> doing.

That registry exists at 
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/text-directory-registrations>; a 
revision of RFC2425 probably should cite that.

> Some things to note:
> 
> - The latest CardDAV spec (-02) was just published. This now pretty much 
> echoes exactly what is in the CalDAV Spec (RFC4791) and I was planning 
> on asking for a last call on it soon.
> 
> - One thing did get removed from CardDAV in the last revision - the 
> "synchronization" report feature. I removed this because a similar 
> feature is also needed by CalDAV, and is arguably applicable to WebDAV 
> as a whole. I was planning on writing that up as a separate spec (work 
> under way). I would like to see such a specification also be dealt with 
> by this group - I think it is in scope on the basis that it does touch 
> on synchronization issues (and more specifically for deployment - 
> performance).

Having that stand-alone sounds right, please do it on the former WebDAV 
WG's mailing list...


 > ...

Best regards, Julian