Re: draft survey form
Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM> Tue, 09 April 1991 14:39 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05168; Tue, 9 Apr 91 10:39:51 -0400
Received: from ws28.nisc.sri.com by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05163; Tue, 9 Apr 91 10:39:44 -0400
Received: by ws28.nisc.sri.com (5.64/SRI-NISC1.1) id AA00582; Tue, 9 Apr 91 07:38:28 -0700
Message-Id: <9104091438.AA00582@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
To: Tim Howes <Tim.Howes@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
Cc: disi, rlang@NISC.SRI.COM
Subject: Re: draft survey form
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 08 Apr 91 22:51:37 -0400. <9104090251.AA05717@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1991 07:38:25 -0700
From: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 91 22:51:37 -0400 From: Tim Howes <Tim.Howes@terminator.cc.umich.edu> > > X.500 Product and Public Domain Implementation Survey > > I think the title should just read "X.500 Implementation Survey". The > distinction between a product and pd implementation should be mentioned > in the description of the implementation. Also, "public domain > implementation" does not cover things like QUIPU, which are not, > technically, in the public domain but are freely available (somebody > correct me if I'm wrong). -- Tim Tim, I agree that less verbose is better. Do you know of a coined phrase that describes freely available but not necessarily public domain software? Thanks, Ruth
- draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Steve Kille
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang