Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu

(Richard Bowles) <bowles@stsci.edu> Thu, 21 March 1991 19:37 UTC

Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA28422; Thu, 21 Mar 91 14:37:25 -0500
Received: from stsci.edu by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA28418; Thu, 21 Mar 91 14:37:22 -0500
Received: Thu, 21 Mar 91 14:37:49 EST from GHOST.STSCI.EDU by stsci.edu (4.1)
Received: Thu, 21 Mar 91 14:37:46 EST by ghost.stsci.edu (4.1)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1991 14:37:46 -0500
From: bowles@stsci.edu
Message-Id: <9103211937.AA12207@GHOST.STSCI.EDU>
To: disi
Subject: Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu

> From disi-owner@merit.edu Thu Mar 21 12:33:35 1991
> To: disi@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu
> 
> I hate getting all this mail, for what it's worth.
>         Russ
> 

I agree.  If the groups are different enough to exist
separately, they should have separate lists. (i.e.
let the user decide).

Richard Bowles