Re: draft survey form

James M Galvin <galvin@TIS.COM> Tue, 09 April 1991 12:47 UTC

Received: by (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA03733; Tue, 9 Apr 91 08:47:57 -0400
Received: from TIS.COM by (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA03729; Tue, 9 Apr 91 08:47:55 -0400
Received: from TIS.COM by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA16754; Tue, 9 Apr 91 08:47:53 EDT
Message-Id: <9104091247.AA16754@TIS.COM>
Reply-To: James M Galvin <galvin@TIS.COM>
To: Ruth Lang <>
Cc: disi,
Subject: Re: draft survey form
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 08 Apr 91 16:12:11 PDT. <>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 91 08:47:39 -0400
From: James M Galvin <galvin@TIS.COM>


	<State compliance with or describe any voids in implementation with
	respect to both the '88 standard and the 88 OIW Implementation
	Agreements.  E.g., '88 Standard: Search function not yet

What do you think about calling out security features the same way you call
out the search function:

	E.g., '88 Standard: Search function not yet implemented or Strong
	authentication not yet implemented.