Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu
Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM> Thu, 21 March 1991 20:25 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA29463; Thu, 21 Mar 91 15:25:21 -0500
Received: from ws28.nisc.sri.com by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA29270; Thu, 21 Mar 91 15:17:22 -0500
Received: by ws28.nisc.sri.com (5.64/SRI-NISC1.1) id AA01302; Thu, 21 Mar 91 12:17:05 -0800
Message-Id: <9103212017.AA01302@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
To: disi
Subject: Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1991 12:17:04 -0800
From: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 91 14:37:46 -0500 From: (Richard Bowles) <bowles@stsci.edu> > I agree. If the groups are different enough to exist > separately, they should have separate lists. (i.e. > let the user decide). > > Richard Bowles I too vote for separate lists. Ruth Lang
- osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Steve Kille
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Ralph E. Droms
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Russ Wright
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu (Richard Bowles)
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Ruth Lang
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Mark Knopper
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Sylvain Langlois
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Chris Weider
- Re: osi-ds as a sublist of disi@merit.edu Joan C. Thompson