Re: draft survey form

Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM> Tue, 09 April 1991 14:55 UTC

Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05520; Tue, 9 Apr 91 10:55:50 -0400
Received: from ws28.nisc.sri.com by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05513; Tue, 9 Apr 91 10:55:46 -0400
Received: by ws28.nisc.sri.com (5.64/SRI-NISC1.1) id AA00600; Tue, 9 Apr 91 07:54:23 -0700
Message-Id: <9104091454.AA00600@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
To: James M Galvin <galvin@TIS.COM>
Cc: disi, wright@lbl.gov, rlang@NISC.SRI.COM
Subject: Re: draft survey form
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 09 Apr 91 08:47:39 -0400. <9104091247.AA16754@TIS.COM>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 91 07:54:21 PDT
From: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>

Date: Tue, 09 Apr 91 08:47:39 -0400
From: James M Galvin <galvin@TIS.COM>;

> What do you think about calling out security features the same way you call
> out the search function:
> 
> 	E.g., '88 Standard: Search function not yet implemented or Strong
> 	authentication not yet implemented.
> 
> Jim

Jim,

Sure.  It wouldn't hurt to embellish the example to remind folks of
this often neglected area.

Thanks,

Ruth