Re: draft survey form
Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM> Tue, 09 April 1991 14:55 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05520; Tue, 9 Apr 91 10:55:50 -0400
Received: from ws28.nisc.sri.com by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05513; Tue, 9 Apr 91 10:55:46 -0400
Received: by ws28.nisc.sri.com (5.64/SRI-NISC1.1) id AA00600; Tue, 9 Apr 91 07:54:23 -0700
Message-Id: <9104091454.AA00600@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
To: James M Galvin <galvin@TIS.COM>
Cc: disi, wright@lbl.gov, rlang@NISC.SRI.COM
Subject: Re: draft survey form
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 09 Apr 91 08:47:39 -0400. <9104091247.AA16754@TIS.COM>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1991 07:54:21 -0700
From: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 91 08:47:39 -0400 From: James M Galvin <galvin@TIS.COM> > What do you think about calling out security features the same way you call > out the search function: > > E.g., '88 Standard: Search function not yet implemented or Strong > authentication not yet implemented. > > Jim Jim, Sure. It wouldn't hurt to embellish the example to remind folks of this often neglected area. Thanks, Ruth
- draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Steve Kille
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang