Re: X.500 Survey status
Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM> Wed, 08 May 1991 15:45 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05200; Wed, 8 May 91 11:45:49 -0400
Received: from ws28.nisc.sri.com by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA05196; Wed, 8 May 91 11:45:47 -0400
Received: by ws28.nisc.sri.com (5.64/SRI-NISC1.1) id AA02510; Wed, 8 May 91 08:45:23 -0700
Message-Id: <9105081545.AA02510@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
To: sturtevant@CCC.NERSC.GOV
Cc: disi, rlang@NISC.SRI.COM
Subject: Re: X.500 Survey status
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 08 May 91 08:15:13 -0700. <910508081513.21e0872d@CCC.NERSC.GOV>
Date: Wed, 08 May 1991 08:45:22 -0700
From: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>
Date: Wed, 8 May 91 08:15:13 PDT From: sturtevant@CCC.NERSC.GOV (Allen Sturtevant - ESnet) > I assume if you never hear from these vendors that you will draft something > up and try and get their stamp-of-approval on your results. Of all the > responses received, the ones mentioned above are the ones that I am most > interested in seeing. > > Allen Russ and I understand our role in the creation of this document as being editors, not authors. Although we weren't planning to write descriptions, we may try to directly contact silent companies and encourage them to submit. The editors of the NOC Tools RFC relayed the fact that when the it was made publically available, that they received many "me too" responses. We hope that this will happen as well for this RFC. Ruth p.s. I had this written when Russ's response arrived in my mailbox, so forwarded it rather than rewrite it.
- X.500 Survey status Russ Wright
- RE: X.500 Survey status Allen Sturtevant - ESnet
- Re: RE: X.500 Survey status Russ Wright
- Re: X.500 Survey status Ruth Lang
- RE: X.500 Survey status Allen Sturtevant <sturtevant@CCC.NERSC.GOV>
- Re: X.500 Survey status Ruth Lang