Re: draft survey form
Tim Howes <Tim.Howes@terminator.cc.umich.edu> Tue, 09 April 1991 02:51 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA28510; Mon, 8 Apr 91 22:51:56 -0400
Received: from terminator.cc.umich.edu by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA28506; Mon, 8 Apr 91 22:51:53 -0400
Received: from terminator.cc.umich.edu by terminator.cc.umich.edu (5.64/1123-1.0) id AA05717; Mon, 8 Apr 91 22:51:38 -0400
Message-Id: <9104090251.AA05717@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
To: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>
Cc: disi
Subject: Re: draft survey form
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Apr 91 16:12:11 PDT." <9104082312.AA00297@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1991 22:51:37 -0400
From: Tim Howes <Tim.Howes@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
> X.500 Product and Public Domain Implementation Survey I think the title should just read "X.500 Implementation Survey". The distinction between a product and pd implementation should be mentioned in the description of the implementation. Also, "public domain implementation" does not cover things like QUIPU, which are not, technically, in the public domain but are freely available (somebody correct me if I'm wrong). -- Tim
- draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Steve Kille
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang