Re: RE: X.500 Survey status
wright@lbl.gov (Russ Wright) Wed, 08 May 1991 15:34 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA04935; Wed, 8 May 91 11:34:34 -0400
Received: from lbl.gov by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA04929; Wed, 8 May 91 11:34:30 -0400
Received: from Mac-mailer ([128.3.148.18]) by lbl.gov (4.1/1.39) id AA01667; Wed, 8 May 91 08:35:01 PDT
Message-Id: <9105081535.AA01667@lbl.gov>
Date: Wed, 08 May 1991 08:34:28 -0000
From: wright@lbl.gov
To: sturtevant@ccc.nersc.gov
Subject: Re: RE: X.500 Survey status
Cc: disi
Alan, > I assume if you never hear from these vendors that you will draft something > up and try and get their stamp-of-approval on your results. Of all the > responses received, the ones mentioned above are the ones that I am most > interested in seeing. I wouldn't assume that. We are getting contact information for Retix and Siemens and will send mail off to them. If you have a contact at Wollongong or Unisys, let us know. If they don't reply, they won't be in the RFC unless someone is willing to write them up (I'm not). My best guess is that they are not aware of the survey. Once they are, I'll bet that they will be happy to help us out. Russ P.S. Ruth - Please comment if you disagree.
- X.500 Survey status Russ Wright
- RE: X.500 Survey status Allen Sturtevant - ESnet
- Re: RE: X.500 Survey status Russ Wright
- Re: X.500 Survey status Ruth Lang
- RE: X.500 Survey status Allen Sturtevant <sturtevant@CCC.NERSC.GOV>
- Re: X.500 Survey status Ruth Lang