[Disman] FW: [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652)
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 11 May 2010 12:52 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B8B3A6A4C for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2010 05:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.992
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.992 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.607, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g8VlK5n93WNU for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2010 05:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656493A680E for <disman@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2010 05:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,206,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="15343960"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2010 06:22:55 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,206,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="473773589"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2010 06:22:55 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:22:37 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04021BE9DE@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652)
Thread-Index: Acrw87IUjlSAahWfSR+FaYiFX0hqcwAACrvA
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Disman <disman@ietf.org>
Subject: [Disman] FW: [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652)
X-BeenThere: disman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/disman>
List-Post: <mailto:disman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:52:54 -0000
-----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 1:21 PM To: bidulock@openss7.org; schishol@nortelnetworks.com; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); iesg@iesg.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) The following errata report has been rejected for RFC3877, "Alarm Management Information Base (MIB)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3877&eid=1652 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Brian Bidulock <bidulock@openss7.org> Date Reported: 2009-01-13 Rejected by: Dan Romascanu (IESG) Section: 5.4 Original Text ------------- alarmModelState -> ituAlarmPerceivedSeverity 1 -> clear (1) 2 -> indeterminate (2) 3 -> warning (6) 4 -> minor (5) 5 -> major (4) 6 -> critical (3) Corrected Text -------------- alarmModelState -> ituAlarmPerceivedSeverity 1 -> clear (1) 2 -> warning (6) 3 -> indeterminate (2) 4 -> minor (5) 5 -> major (4) 6 -> critical (3) Notes ----- alarmModelState requires that the states be defined from less severe to more severe; however, under ITU-T PerceivedSeverity from ITU-T Rec. X.721 | ISO/IEC 10165-2 "indeterminate" is more severe than "warning". This change corrects the order to match the requirement for order of severity for alarmModelState. --VERIFIER NOTES-- While the discrepancy between the documents is unfortunate, there is not a technical requirement for the enumeration values to be identical, nor is there a technical requirement for the labels to be identical, even though there is obviously considerable documentation value in avoiding gratuitous differences. What *is* technically important is that the MIB be able to uniquely represent all the cases from M.3100, and it accomplishes that goal. In a future version of the document we can add an informative note alerting implementors to the discrepancies in numbering and spelling, so their implementations can include appropriate mapping functions to avoid losing information. -------------------------------------- RFC3877 (draft-ietf-disman-alarm-mib-18) -------------------------------------- Title : Alarm Management Information Base (MIB) Publication Date : September 2004 Author(s) : S. Chisholm, D. Romascanu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Distributed Management Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Disman] Fw: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3877 … Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3877 … Randy Presuhn
- [Disman] Fw: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3877 … Randy Presuhn
- [Disman] RFC 3877 errata Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 errata Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 errata Sharon Chisholm
- Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 errata Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 errata Michael Thatcher
- Re: [Disman] Fw: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [Disman] FW: [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] [Errata Rejected] RFC3877 (1652) Romascanu, Dan (Dan)