[Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6
"Mark A. Flacy" <mflacy@verizon.net> Sat, 29 January 2011 22:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mflacy@verizon.net>
X-Original-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153483A6894 for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:19:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HXdi0UuF6e+v for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net (vms173013pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9543A6890 for <disman@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from flacy ([unknown] [173.74.205.75]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LFT00IXT24N7W81@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net> for disman@ietf.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:21:59 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:21:59 -0600
From: "Mark A. Flacy" <mflacy@verizon.net>
To: disman@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.8
Message-id: <1296339719.32535.0@flacy>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; DelSp="Yes"; Format="Flowed"
Content-disposition: inline
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6
X-BeenThere: disman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mflacy@verizon.net
List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/disman>
List-Post: <mailto:disman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:19:03 -0000
Greetings, In the version of RFC 3877 available at datatracker.ietf.org, I noticed that the alarmActiveVariableValueType does not include either InetAddressType or InetAddress in the enumeration which does not allow you to indicate an IPv6 address in the alarmActiveVariableTable. The alarmActiveEngineAddress is expressed according to RFC 2851, so that is not a problem. Will alarmActiveVariableValueType be extended to include InetAddressType and InetAddress (along with matching alarmActiveVariableInetAddressTypeVal and alarmActiveVariableInetAddressVal objects in AlarmActiveVariableEntry)? Is there a recommended work-around? Thank you! -- Mark A. Flacy
- [Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6 Mark A. Flacy
- Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6 Juergen Schoenwaelder