Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 31 January 2011 08:14 UTC
Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CAB3A6BAB for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:14:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s0++HgRXx3Ru for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:14:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A547D3A6BB5 for <disman@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:14:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0592BC001F; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:17:28 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id av7N22dWhJ7r; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:17:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E44C0003; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:17:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id BC4231633CFA; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:17:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:17:15 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Mark A. Flacy" <mflacy@verizon.net>
Message-ID: <20110131081715.GB260@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: "Mark A. Flacy" <mflacy@verizon.net>, disman@ietf.org
References: <1296339719.32535.0@flacy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1296339719.32535.0@flacy>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: disman@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6
X-BeenThere: disman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/disman>
List-Post: <mailto:disman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:14:16 -0000
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 04:21:59PM -0600, Mark A. Flacy wrote: > Greetings, > > In the version of RFC 3877 available at datatracker.ietf.org, I > noticed that the alarmActiveVariableValueType does not include > either InetAddressType or InetAddress in the enumeration which does > not allow you to indicate an IPv6 address in the > alarmActiveVariableTable. The alarmActiveEngineAddress is expressed > according to RFC 2851, so that is not a problem. > > Will alarmActiveVariableValueType be extended to include > InetAddressType and InetAddress (along with matching > alarmActiveVariableInetAddressTypeVal and > alarmActiveVariableInetAddressVal objects in > AlarmActiveVariableEntry)? > Is there a recommended work-around? And InetAddress is encoded as an OCTET STRING and hence you should be fine using alarmActiveVariableOctetStringVal (and for the InetAddressType you would use alarmActiveVariableInteger32Val). /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
- [Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6 Mark A. Flacy
- Re: [Disman] RFC 3877 and IPv6 Juergen Schoenwaelder