Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib..
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortel.com> Wed, 04 February 2009 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <SCHISHOL@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: disman@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0803A6A3E for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:44:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9w2rOJyJolF for <disman@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:44:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zcars04f.nortel.com (zcars04f.nortel.com [47.129.242.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF56F3A6A75 for <disman@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:44:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com [47.129.230.99]) by zcars04f.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n14FiGS11790; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:44:18 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:44:15 -0500
Message-ID: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B41835306A@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <4946D492.5070107@redback.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Disman] another question about alarmMib..
Thread-Index: AclfATVoebNqPFukRwKXxHkYT/Beegn3gyPw
References: <4946D492.5070107@redback.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortel.com>
To: Michael Thatcher <thatcher@redback.com>, disman@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib..
X-BeenThere: disman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/disman>
List-Post: <mailto:disman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:44:43 -0000
Hi The DataAndTime index is just a convenience for sorting and/or filtering. It is not necessary to ensure uniqueness of entries. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: disman-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:disman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thatcher Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 5:05 PM To: disman@ietf.org Subject: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. the alarmActiveTable is indexed by alarmListName, alarmDataAndTime, alarmActiveIndex the alarmActiveVariableTable is indexed by alarmListName, alarmActiveIndex, alarmActiveVariableIndex. How come alarmDataAndTime are not an index into the alarmActiveVariableTable, since this table by definition has the varbind objects from the corresponding entry in alarmActiveTable? This also seems to imply that alarmActiveIndex is always unique regardless of alarmDataAndTime. Is this intentional? miket
- [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Michael Thatcher
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Michael Thatcher
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Michael Thatcher
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] another question about alarmMib.. Sharon Chisholm