Re: [dispatch] X over websockets

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 2/13/14 3:28 PM, Sergio Garcia Murillo wrote:
> El 13/02/2014 19:38, Paul Kyzivat escribió:
>> On 2/13/14 11:07 AM, Sergio Garcia Murillo wrote:
>>> What I mean is that I expect quite a lot of "over websocekts" drafts and
>>> we should try to use the same solution for advertising it in the SDP,
>>> and not have each one have their own way of handling it.
>>
>> Sigh. Yes, once we had the first of these, it was only a matter of
>> time before the flood began.
>>
>> What concerns me is that for every "X over websockets" there is
>> probably also a good argument for "X over WebRTC Data Channel".
>>
>> Are we going to let that happen?
>>
>> Or for each X are we going to have a beauty contest between websockets
>> and data channel?
>>
>> Or what?
>
> Completely agree, we should try to "close" that discussion once and for
> all and not have the same arguments and discussions in each draft. I am
> not really aware of the IETF process, but could be possible to create a
> draft to address it?

It's kind of late to do anything about it before the draft cutoff.

Continuing to discuss here on the dispatch list isn't such a bad way to 
start out. Then maybe some hallway discussion in London.

After that, maybe a draft for dispatch or RAI Area would be helpful.

If we wanted to do both for everything, then ISTM that some of the 
mapping can be the same for websockets and data channel. The part that 
is hard to unify is the SDP negotiation. Could we come up with some 
approach where doing these is easy and consistent?

	Thanks,
	Paul