Re: [dispatch] De-munging mailing list messages

worley@ariadne.com Mon, 22 August 2022 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D83C152575 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.991
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.991 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eBygrfwpWF2 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-a1p-077720.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-a1p-077720.sys.comcast.net [96.103.146.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68E83C1522C7 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-a1p-077245.sys.comcast.net ([96.103.145.236]) by resqmta-a1p-077720.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id PvhHo13OmF13EPxHKo1t91; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 02:35:02 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20211018a; t=1661135702; bh=7NUuUNXM9I+j/7thJyBqDWfy6NceZ9MP9TGQzo21HfI=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=D9XjCnZ1Y0LyW/+ac5PWanAu5agdNk/KpivghDiOCIEIGvz9gWAzB23vKr1vzLCY/ KGtgxqbHRRzU2I6aOxcd7htGqtjJ8zX2w5dFj4Pu4XSMDrytkpAdRRyWg5eml/BJCN 7+9zowETYXlKkX+PIJ7npbpPBKVLQnlvFI8aGT6dQ1TaSFRnsjmKc3czeZxHceyqvh rHaUC/LgqP5yIpqWqljur5WnRwx0pHNN7yzyrSBFvEt+gyEhwYYDVtf/eOzHX7icll RqeSPdst4T3ubTNDTSsNo1NOODry+NJPlPih2RJLNkDblmEwDY1BMN9DgtztiarkD0 LX0vY5p9eiuRw==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430::a643]) by resomta-a1p-077245.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id PxHFofUcZ7jkqPxHGompb4; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 02:35:00 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 27M2YuYD2148262 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:34:56 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 27M2YtVo2148259; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:34:55 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <e9da8819-e60b-54ef-e3d7-db5230a8adcc@tana.it> (vesely@tana.it)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:34:55 -0400
Message-ID: <87o7wdj99s.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/12m0kvxwdNYSBoHSTSK0PV0y0qc>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] De-munging mailing list messages
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 02:37:10 -0000

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> writes:
> I asked these questions to dmarc list, but they're fed up with the
> topic of indirect mail flows, which they dealt with specifying ARC.

Dare I ask

1) Does ARC actually solve the problems with our mailing lists?

2) If so, have we implemented it?

3) If so, does it turn out to work in practice?

Dale