[dispatch] Re: Outcomes from the joint art and sec dispatch session @ IETF 123

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 25 July 2025 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9424B14816; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 04:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD=1.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g5mSwyb62s6N; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 04:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFEB54B14811; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 04:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:67c:370:1998:f107:7162:603d:f685] (nat64-bd.meeting.ietf.org [31.130.238.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPSA id 56PBismW044176 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Jul 2025 06:44:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1753443898; bh=wjIRwcdHgHg1bibF8CuLiXwiio9AI/8BfnFo7rGyJug=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=k+BFKizCNMjHNiyeIWw3mcEpy/uogt89a8OuI6X3BiTOUtADwu3wyhaC5wi3g6trT cX0a0Licdflb87apfra8hmGq/LUP3PqtzaBXuLLik5K3wbPJi1reVNc4fr8kyRQbVA sAQF5GuLSeeFTuG58Ar0HsexXGAMfn6v/GdFv64s=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host nat64-bd.meeting.ietf.org [31.130.238.189] claimed to be [IPV6:2001:67c:370:1998:f107:7162:603d:f685]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------eCQTJgmIkIn0Hwb0SsitwYI6"
Message-ID: <3e176e71-eabb-45db-9223-53779d0f7943@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:44:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Debra Petta <debrap@drummondgroup.com>, "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>
References: <6835a93a0dfa4d83947d8bac132ac583@huawei.com> <DM4PR11MB64080DB3CD7655D4EA661013CC5EA@DM4PR11MB6408.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB64080DB3CD7655D4EA661013CC5EA@DM4PR11MB6408.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID-Hash: 752XSETLQ6PBYH3SIDNG5VHWJ4MHFY3B
X-Message-ID-Hash: 752XSETLQ6PBYH3SIDNG5VHWJ4MHFY3B
X-MailFrom: rjsparks@nostrum.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dispatch.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "dispatch-chairs@ietf.org" <dispatch-chairs@ietf.org>, "secdispatch-chairs@ietf.org" <secdispatch-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dispatch] Re: Outcomes from the joint art and sec dispatch session @ IETF 123
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/3iACvFBjutWXDFi_zZk3d98ffuI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dispatch-leave@ietf.org>

Answering with no hats:

Early discussion with the relevant ADs will go a long way - reach out to 
them now.

RjS

On 7/24/25 5:24 PM, Debra Petta wrote:
>
> Hi Dispatch –
>
> I have a question regarding the formation of a BOF.  If my outcome is 
> to have a BOF, is it necessary for me to submit a BOF proposal as 
> outlined in https://www.ietf.org/process/bofs/,
> or because that was already the agreed-upon outcome should I just 
> start the formation of my BOF?
>
> Should my BOF just be through an online group discussion using the 
> assigned IETF mailing list or do I need to also request time at the 
> next IETF meeting?
>
> Thanks in advance for the clarification.
>
> -Debra
>
> *From:*Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) 
> <pengshuping=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2025 5:37 AM
> *To:* dispatch@ietf.org; secdispatch@ietf.org
> *Cc:* dispatch-chairs@ietf.org; secdispatch-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Secdispatch] Outcomes from the joint art and sec dispatch 
> session @ IETF 123
>
> Hi,
> Please find a summary of the dispatch outcomes of the joint dispatch 
> session of sec and art.
> ### ART Topics
> 1. Open Cloud Mesh
> A WG-Forming BoF
> 2. RFC 4130 Specification Update (AS2 EDIINT)
> A BOF and make sure to engage people who are willing to do work
> 3. JSON Challenger
> To work with CBOR chairs and ADs to see the CBOR rechartering 
> possibilities
> 4. The agent:// Protocol -- A URI-Based Framework for Interoperable Agents
> A non-WG-Forming BoF
> ### Joint ART/SEC Topics
> 1. JSContact/EARL Peer-to-Peer Security Scheme
> CALEXT WG for the JSContact and JOSE or a BoF for the crypto part
> 2. Unobtrusive End-to-End Email Signatures
> MAILMAINT or a side meeting
> ### SEC Topics
> 1. Merkle Tree Certificates
> A BoF with a narrow scope and a mailing list before BoF
> 2. PSI based on ECDH
> Not clear now. More offline discussions.
> The meeting minutes are here for your reference. Many thanks to our 
> note taker Bron Gondwana!
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-123-dispatch-202507210730/
> Thank you and Cheers!
> Best Regards,
> Shuping on behalf of the joint dispatch co-Chairs
>