Re: [dispatch] dispatching draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime

Christer Holmberg <> Tue, 12 December 2017 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4331292AE for <>; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:48:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUXJIgetRDDH for <>; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47814128B8F for <>; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:48:10 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-d49ff70000006bc7-a0-5a2f97c84f31
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8C.73.27591.8C79F2A5; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:48:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:48:07 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: Mary Barnes <>, Cullen Jennings <>
CC: DISPATCH list <>
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] dispatching draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime
Thread-Index: AQHTb9ZGvM+3H/6IHUaKjTzoreqq66M+kjiAgADtUAA=
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:48:07 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D655659A274C3christerholmbergericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrMIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7ge6J6fpRBve75C2WTlrAavFh/Q9G i8/79zM7MHvsnHWX3WPJkp9MHpfPf2QMYI7isklJzcksSy3St0vgyljdOZO94LNGRfsViwbG P4pdjJwcEgImEq/WzmbqYuTiEBI4zCix/sQvRghnCaPE2bbZQA4HB5uAhUT3P22QBhEBX4kN szvYQGxmAVWJ86c6mUFsYQE3idczWplBykUE3CUa2+QgTCuJpXNUQSpYgKr3bb8M1skrYC3R suMyC8SmBkaJz8/OMIEkOAUCJc50LwAbySggJvH91BomiFXiEreezGeCuFlAYsme88wQtqjE y8f/WEFsUQE9iQ0nbrOD7JUQUJKYtjUNojVB4uDrHSwQewUlTs58wjKBUXQWkqmzkJTNQlIG ETeQeH9uPjOErS2xbOFrKFtfYuOXs4wQtrXE+Q+t7MhqFjByrGIULU4tTspNNzLSSy3KTC4u zs/Ty0st2cQIjMqDW34b7GB8+dzxEKMAB6MSD29ri36UEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHe7iagEG9K YmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcd6TnrxRQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBsaWSGXzWULS5U+K zpzV/KKQ6rDmXsyWIq5vpkLsykxOBw6zuey4vXmK2OUAm5gGCY4q1R2XldJZc5cx5T7OvP+s 5u1yjWUrqgydvs7fd2ZWaNRhHbu+qqSyYx1myYtfHXvcLCDtfLFPTvrBjht9WYln/7YwbrAp PL4644QC11KTIwc3qz24pqbEUpyRaKjFXFScCABjY8W4xgIAAA==
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] dispatching draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:48:12 -0000


> As an individual, I have a slight preference for a mini WG as I think that would make it easier for this to get on the radar of security folks before it goes through IETF LC.  The
> whole notion of a mini WG was to provide a lightweight process for work that might be of a bit broader interest than other drafts we have AD sponsored in the past that are of more interest to a narrower group (e.g., 3GPP specific docs).
> And, yeah, I know that we likely have the most expert people in IETF working on this, but in the spirit of transparency I don't necessarily think that's the highest priority factor when we determine how to dispatch work items.

While the protocol experts may be in IETF, some major users of the protocols are outside IETF. For example, I got feedback of the –00 version by one of my GSMA colleagues, forwarded it to the author, and it has now been addressed in section 9.1 of the –01 version.

But again, as long as we make sure the appropriate people are made aware of the draft, and will have an opportunity to review it before publication, I have no strong feelings whether it’s done as AD sponsored, within a mini-WG or within an existing WG. Same people :)



On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Cullen Jennings <<>> wrote:

>From all the discussions so far, it seems the most logical path for this draft is AD sponsor. If anyone has any strong objections to this draft being AD sponsored, please let us know by Dec 14.

Thanks, Cullen <with my co-chair hat on>

dispatch mailing list<>