Re: [dispatch] A protocol for anonymity

Hernâni Marques (p≡p project) <> Sat, 09 March 2019 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C41F124B0C; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 04:42:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.62
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00dKRb3s7-pI; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 04:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3E912787D; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 04:42:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255B2171C06D; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 13:42:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHAad8Hsb8QM; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 13:42:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32D90171C05E; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 13:42:43 +0100 (CET)
References: <>
From: =?UTF-8?B?SGVybsOibmkgTWFycXVlcyAocOKJoXAgcHJvamVjdCk=?= <>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 13:42:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="15GsM9x9sqOeANIq7pH6mHs3e60SJeu85"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] A protocol for anonymity
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:42:57 -0000

Hello Martin

Thanks for this contribution: that sounds very interesting -- we already
had such ideas already in within pretty Easy privacy (pEp); by instance,
for PGP/MIME with the SMTP transport, which is one of the reasons why we
do header protection by encapsulation (cf. ;
not sure yet if your approach works on the same application level, but
discussions on such approaches should go forward.

From pEp side we would also be interested to contribute to actual
implementations in such directions.

Is there already any practical work? Cannot grasp that from the draft. :)



I also added the MEDUP list CC, which exists to discuss concrete drafts
(ideally with Running Code) to achieve decentralized privacy forms:

On 09.03.19 11:42, RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) wrote:

> Hi,
> Martin Gwerder has presented his draft to me for publication on the
> Independent Stream.
> The document describes and specifies a protocol designed to achieve
> anonymity by embedding messages within existing transfer protocols such as
> Martin tells me that he has made some overtures to the IETF, but has been
> unable to find an opening to discuss his work. I think that may be because
> it can sometimes be quite hard for a newcomer to work out how to find a
> way in, especially for a topic that is not easily aligned with what we're
> currently working on.
> So, before I take this under my wing, I wondered whether you see a place
> where you think this should be discussed within the IETF.
> Thanks for any clues,
> Adrian