Re: [dispatch] DKIM-FBL
Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> Mon, 25 September 2023 17:56 UTC
Return-Path: <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04DDC169513 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bluepopcorn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGBbjruc53Uj for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from v2.bluepopcorn.net (v2.bluepopcorn.net [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a994::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1CCC169515 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluepopcorn.net; s=supersize; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4PDdpMkvoymxB4V6WnDMMDy6cjHA244UquODiuUAOmE=; b=nquhfN0znrgELLyX6+I7xEk6if +xZMSTOGilfZxMhTB9NtK7SfJj6qBRTMIyX1iT/ohMdOGl9GoYrh3twqb4JEaTsBoXfNhaOjVd4un OeXzRomX0tO1tXCfyC7PmUFKwF0wOH448Dy0e47pFkhpcgsfUcBTTYnNUuhivA8vO2xk=;
Received: from [2601:647:6880:ac1:8829:1c68:2dae:45c6] (helo=[10.10.20.192]) by v2.bluepopcorn.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>) id 1qkpp3-0004QU-C2; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:56:50 -0700
From: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
To: "Brotman, Alex" <Alex_Brotman=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:56:48 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5852)
Message-ID: <6A49FBA5-F971-4E81-BEA0-26E10E95FA70@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4351D2A3E8B54C24FD8BBC8EF7FCA@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB4351D2A3E8B54C24FD8BBC8EF7FCA@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/8Pzq3lZ4U0IpVT9gZZfm5LP1QU8>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] DKIM-FBL
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:56:56 -0000
Hi Alex, Discussion of app-area drafts that don’t fit elsewhere probably belongs on the art@ietf.org list at least initially. Dispatch is mostly relevant for discussing the “where should this work be done” question. On that latter point, this isn’t DMARC but the reporting mechanism is related to some aspects of DMARC, so it would be good to announce the existence of the draft (and where discussion will be held) there. -Jim On 25 Sep 2023, at 10:33, Brotman, Alex wrote: > I'm not quite sure which list should get this draft for discussion. It doesn't quite feel like the dkim list is the proper place. Would the smtp list be more appropriate? Thanks > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brotman-dkim-fbl/ > > -- > Alex Brotman > Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy > Comcast > > > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
- [dispatch] DKIM-FBL Brotman, Alex
- Re: [dispatch] DKIM-FBL Jim Fenton
- Re: [dispatch] DKIM-FBL Brotman, Alex
- Re: [dispatch] DKIM-FBL Jim Fenton
- Re: [dispatch] DKIM-FBL Brotman, Alex