Received: from smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch
 [84.16.66.175])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest
 SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA2930
	for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mx.ietf.org;
	dkim=pass header.d=not4bflu55.de header.s=20260209 header.b=qLyDVZ+9;
	dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=not4bflu55.de;
	spf=pass (mx.ietf.org: domain of dorfzwockel@not4bflu55.de designates
 84.16.66.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dorfzwockel@not4bflu55.de
Received: from smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch
 [10.7.10.107])
	by smtp-4-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hkkFl27tSz6WZ
	for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:01:15 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=not4bflu55.de;
	s=20260209; t=1789480875;
	bh=l1ARnZ6fpncO/5WGeeWyj1hhMFXKN6b0OqdquvIw2eU=;
	h=Subject:Date:From:To:Reply-To:From;
	b=qLyDVZ+9YPNcDiszqpVxHMaD7JLNHyd0EqnW6QYN5sJw60FGpGrpESaVsbEE6ZUlk
	 0gl6z94RJMUYJnAgkGPta/7GAQcsAEQxuze9LMQOYkQMD117SPdYh+4j4BUd/jiagt
	 adVkXGRdBb/4ejsY/ekgtHgAy9nuzl6xzhujKI9ILfLgdVFBfTR73BSUAAH5dkJ8Sn
	 2pe2vPxiFu9lzXWv8q9FDRdMMlNeXb3ZYwyWAFfO1zDuzcmSZAjxOSILhbZq7MH8Iy
	 YM/MKe6ndXzp9+wLyTTRKq3jS/vXi0cVE3ZJT8XIlCwMKlCRbcywKU+O8diaZxCkhk
	 E97dFl0o+GFcw==
Received: from unknown by smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA
 id 4hkkFk6KDbzQYm
	for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:01:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <f8893586-a5da-4c88-a8e7-512f0b5e8cb5@mail.infomaniak.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:01:14 +0200
From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCchow?= <dorfzwockel@not4bflu55.de>
To: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>
X-WS-Location: eJxzKUpMKykGAAfpAmU-
X-Mailer: Infomaniak Workspace (1.3.1352)
X-WS-User-Origin: 
 eyJpdiI6IlN3S2dLTjJ6Y1FaYWVPS2RlTFAwbXc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiMU0ybUo4SkZGdFdMTS81cUgyQlpGdz09IiwibWFjIjoiZjc2OGYxYWQ5MzkyOTNhNzlmMjllYTIxN2ExMjRhMTQ0ZTUwMzg5Y2EzZDZhMzYxZDg5MDgzYzUxNjdmNDVjYyIsInRhZyI6IiJ9
X-WS-User-Mbox: 
 eyJpdiI6Ijl2WUJCeDdwZE9TQ3BJY3lLbm0yMWc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiMDgrRlRaOWxRREdWSTRBaHlsK2JFdz09IiwibWFjIjoiYmMwYjdlMTg0ZDYyM2VmMWQ3MDkzODZmZmUwYjQyZTBkN2ExZmMzOWZlZDAxZGM2OTFjYmFkZTcwZmVmYTQxZiIsInRhZyI6IiJ9
X-WS-LOCALE: de_DE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=spHxjKng
X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Message-ID-Hash: 37BG3VJQ5FRCF7ZQBHVWYOZK6GFGCZBN
X-Message-ID-Hash: 37BG3VJQ5FRCF7ZQBHVWYOZK6GFGCZBN
X-MailFrom: dorfzwockel@not4bflu55.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; header-match-dispatch.ietf.org-0; emergency;
 member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest;
 max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests;
 suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCchow?= <dorfzwockel@not4bflu55.de>
Subject: [dispatch] Re: Venue guidance for draft-luechow-route86-timestamp-01
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/9u3OU4khdADMKsLLa05NMVXLO7Q>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dispatch-leave@ietf.org>

--spHxjKng
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you both for the helpful guidance. I=E2=80=99ll keep Route86
applic=
ation-specific for now, address ordering and uniqueness
separately, and r=
evisit RFC publication if multiple applications need
interoperability.
=

Best regards,

Thomas L=C3=BCchow
--spHxjKng
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head></head><body>Thank you both for the helpful guidance. I=
=E2=80=99ll keep Route86 application-specific for now, address ordering and=
 uniqueness separately, and revisit RFC publication if multiple application=
s need interoperability.<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>Thomas L=C3=BCchow</bo=
dy></html>
--spHxjKng--

