Re: [dispatch] New ICE WG
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 08:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6541B30FA for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W8Xx-ffHPWnI for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB4A1B2F9D for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.176.150] (dhcp-b096.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.176.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t6M82JWR012246 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:02:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host dhcp-b096.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.176.150] claimed to be [31.133.176.150]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:13 +0200
Message-ID: <26C44125-B805-4CEE-989C-B882BD927C05@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B69748D6D@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B69748D6D@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5107)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/A0Vslqddpg3xrmEAJ0kQXd6Gnf4>
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] New ICE WG
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:02:59 -0000
This was an AD insertion, mainly to let people know that this was being discussed and to get it on people's radar. We could have done a better job of conveying that. It probably would have been better to treat it as a status item (that is, "go look at this") than an agenda item for discussion. Ben. On 22 Jul 2015, at 9:17, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > Why is the first time this comes to the dispatch WG is by jumping the > agenda and dispatch deadlines at 9:15 on the face to face meeting > itself. > > Is there a dispatch process? > > Keith > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
- [dispatch] New ICE WG DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [dispatch] New ICE WG Ben Campbell