Re: [dispatch] Draft on TRIP IANA registry & postal addresses

S Moonesamy <> Thu, 19 July 2018 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D34B131207 for <>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.78
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=TjEVRUhO; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=InDjonWu
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q1da6_uij19t for <>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B5F1310D1 for <>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w6J0FD1V000269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1531959323; x=1532045723; bh=Ic08iyhzQM21+H8UZxWMev8AFp2++0TZdCJvhi65SkY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=TjEVRUhOAKbcEC9ju9XfLp7/VFhivqmpxWbNpmA0/UDhlxKLlVxES5d455ATzeeON xtg7NarIPUBawD4S50vkumct8jTj1LPC5+AKKEaj0wKROXMJYIoy+0kQwcg53dO6JK fc5pFwJgs2O2lezpu3rmaqBI+6+JvU2qslR9/Wp8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1531959323; x=1532045723;; bh=Ic08iyhzQM21+H8UZxWMev8AFp2++0TZdCJvhi65SkY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=InDjonWui6D4uzaj3Ux/B7JdTkUONwuprppEiQHh0gotAmmfq5fGeJfCehmf3y+kE PFEUOgA9uhKLz3xceVOSejenScams5ut7g2mbHFfwC2/t6ngrIhWnWzmeg6rZzDcMa tEmZn1FWFDwRCFnm9MVKugCcaG/f/YwwYSbDEeYc=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:14:44 -0700
To: Jari Arkko <>,
From: S Moonesamy <>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN7k=+7RTdygjDX1ZBza7kMsT-=isjORMTXrkqNpJZoZVg@mail.g>
References: <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Draft on TRIP IANA registry & postal addresses
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:15:26 -0000

Hi Jari,
At 11:14 AM 18-07-2018, Mary Barnes wrote:
>As an individual, I agree with this 
>proposal.  Including the addresses was a 
>carryover from the telecom world where all the 
>registries required (and still do) postal addresses.

The Introduction Section mentions "privacy 
benefit" with respect to postal addresses.  If I 
understood corectly, the issue is about 
PII.  Should both postal and email addresses be 
considered instead of postal addresses only?

S. Moonesamy