Re: [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes
Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1727B3A0B2C for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGJZTeof7MVU for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB0EB3A0B44 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.72.49]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus004 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M424C-1k1YVn2PuS-0003hz; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:08:03 +0200
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:08:02 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, DISPATCH WG <dispatch@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1728083860.882593.1596215282277@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKV6Hv=9bvr5WYTM7G7khL3cSyxM_9tFGAoLgNwdD9CMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E72B7AFF-74F4-4CBB-B6F2-197DCD783BC0@nostrum.com> <CALaySJKV6Hv=9bvr5WYTM7G7khL3cSyxM_9tFGAoLgNwdD9CMA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev32
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:xD6Raq2P7454GBFekolps6CW9b+wN8/LX04H1evD8OzpdWY+Fy4 qLEJNj+Dhff/FCt17LLSPyG7y+5qMBNNr5Fov9AL3LFGTAxOoha07XH/JHbxMFjHVFEvEYk XsR2WMubXdHEvN89cAvOgN17werfnTpbOKvBEmVSEpmmRlB5x6ShQVIo5u8XIxelzyvU6Ax fVZ6gnOwcLv25QHj7cltQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:gf2B0/iCrtU=:IwDcNIhEiUKDgVOQNlU8Qe 75QrGPml3BuPX7xbf1oWoRon+VBKJwl05KJLPwp5IbSu+FF+LQbsyjoHv97om068rJ6Bz22/n zDiOegfm+p+zL9GCi0K6eg2Zx9rxznIaoQvm6oaMt6d98NXnhgGgCpEmFQRJHHJTXTjK68sP0 JFdcRUxj0A03EklCYpBz4isTehSmZ9mgXHeRWLCxKB/tvX3HvuRZ6PAnrxc775U+RHeafZZJa HJQCi4rtNWBHJnIWX2Fy6kXftXJIrwDWJYamHqh/70TDMimgghJ1DUsVkixZmt1cPHRdxbrI1 tFiwAfrcy6e2yGpBY7TGVCHRCWJOP55nTXQ8LjDVRmJXRVKCCqHroI4KLSD2LFdvMVmDjYRLy dd0BfTtziCtAzR30J0yvQKd9ExVFW6x7PGVzyMFCYcdZjl/9BRC/0vbH9P3lnWfPi5kI3nwrT pkHbjSggdWmdkSvqZvtapLECMlX8SPpWKngR91GIWoN1AVG9/abafOsJzbyREo6sYPnzuybNg PYohnMKUSr/H4O5z9eIuRiIMAofleAKvHt6qmQtCX8QQGfurI5vm5oaIm2b5wH65Kuqh3kVqG 6q16awfv0PfpEzo25zJRyJcFxRxtMaoeQ1O9o10h6JaRdw+G3WtR/JJGprVSC/wfu4xyr40TI xGNb950/OYFNYQadc9mXykehS4+FdqPd/lojYo/azLkGWhfTES9+VIT2F3R86D9CK8YE3hi3z ApJuSHmKHnli8OkLUCm6+eCAeWBns6m/1jt487tQIzdcOrnpPeyP6zhDOYeCsdaesWfhDr0Zz 770HDrZJIzmY37A8eANxsSj1HbVZF4wzoX1U/KKnLIvuJ04FgE1kdncN1f0wmcYuRijLjl7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/D3j1NNZpBwqVwqgmhnjU_nRyJCc>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:08:19 -0000
that in the in dispatch working group
is administratively was fine but i think
AD sponsored is fine as well
coverage and given there's likely to be
appeals around this
having a working group consensus around
it might be a slight advantage
that's that's the only thing i would
mention
- [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes Ben Campbell
- Re: [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes Barry Leiba
- Re: [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [dispatch] IETF108 DISPATCH Minutes Timothy Mcsweeney