Re: [dispatch] Slight correction on minutes related to BARE

Hi Cullen,

Thanks for the feedback! We will update the minutes accordingly and also
watch the YouTube recording to get the fullest accuracy, and I'll also edit
the chair summary to be less ambiguous.

I'm also sorry to hear the audio in the room was not good, especially
alongside the other technical issues you and other participants faced.
Between the chairs, we also had some connectivity issues and therefore
difficulty checking minutes consistently throughout the session - before
the next time, we will think of better contingency plans for these and
other potential issues for a smoother session at IETF 115.

Thanks again,

Kirsty

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 6:52 PM Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

>
> I think the minutes did not quite capture my input. I think we should
> have a small WG to write a standard that solves this problem. I don't
> care if the solution is BARE, or the TLS encoding, or slightly different
> MLS, or something else. Perhaps even have a bakeoff between them.
>
> I think the chair summary of saying only one company wanted this is not
> accurate. I was clear I would also want to use something like this in my
> drafts vs reinventing the wheel each time.
>
> It was really hard to understand what the remote chairs were saying in
> for the people in the room so my apologies for not catching this when
> you made your summary at the end.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>