Re: [dispatch] Updating DKIM for stronger crypto

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 04:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E190129536 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=nEVaXLLA; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=kGLjeZoL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66kvXnERdato for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B688212951F for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 49868 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2017 04:01:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=c233.58d0a5aa.k1703; bh=NU98XVQGs0bTM0ljNlJbXLys/ZWwZJ/pasYQzdzbzis=; b=nEVaXLLAPIF3CfVJQrHfOtXS9y26XSz8g6CiD9Qd+owEj5A3vYC4xSItPTPVsxp7o9jw1akOZ4RPtCz+qUmDqaHmUzPfIGwQLu44iRzmQtTcvbMxMsfDctileMIhJpu0hNUEFynGSPYK0i9OD5PAfU52CWWPlg1J8aflRUh0bh/vnqGFjkPCzUPuwBoIKCpUgkYICT66B32SAFiRGdQAaGCFJY/tbxL4FFrDqqb9RKsi54EFO/n5Vc/wnmr+uzjS
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=c233.58d0a5aa.k1703; bh=NU98XVQGs0bTM0ljNlJbXLys/ZWwZJ/pasYQzdzbzis=; b=kGLjeZoL2GER/estLXRs5jTDVwiKsyKgB6BxXLnQ9159kzf9Ezzw+qD6n/4Gc2TFzYUHd/ddBaeJ2ToCvvbNeY+4yMNeNgs6nQQF+6k9sO8k+aUOq0ruR1BrPlRZtuMHEoEz3tOS2c8w+v6HlxNpuFXGtr39JY6eMEP/TOar/iBO9Zl3JNrQJbVpE/rS+9R7l3DZ6CXiPu2/ugWvP1b7g/pePvZJ5k9DZ0DKaaZjSVWrvZcTyWaSkjGENbvLTYJD
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 21 Mar 2017 04:01:46 -0000
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:46 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703202359540.21973@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVX3rgMY0ZGmf_xcQ+zgGtCMaZcsymyW2BCWBeAKm_CqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170206020826.1108.qmail@ary.lan> <29F6F66C-F14F-402A-83D4-CAC70841667E@iii.ca> <CABkgnnVX3rgMY0ZGmf_xcQ+zgGtCMaZcsymyW2BCWBeAKm_CqQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (OSX 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/D8Xg5ZD-8MuRtKjU0j9TdLHvhn8>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Updating DKIM for stronger crypto
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:01:49 -0000

> 1. Define use of Ed25519
> 2. Define a modified RSA signature scheme where Sign(k, X) is defined
> as K || Sign-RSA(k, X) and Verify(H, K || M) is Hash(K) == H &&
> Verify-RSA(K, M)

Yup, either or both.

> In looking at this, we should probably dispatch this cross-area to
> CURDLE.

Please, no.  There's nothing interesting about the choice of algorithms, 
only about how to update the DKIM spec to say what to do.

R's,
John