Re: [dispatch] [rtcweb] Datachannel Hackathon at IETF 101 ?

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Thu, 25 January 2018 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EECA12EAA4; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:27:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oh9mOiDZFgXn; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06FE812EA9F; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2003:cd:6bf1:8000:4db0:9cb0:d29e:37e] (p200300CD6BF180004DB09CB0D29E037E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:6bf1:8000:4db0:9cb0:d29e:37e]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 959B8721E280C; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:27:24 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C13F489@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:27:05 +0100
Cc: T H Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>, Felix Weinrank <weinrank@fh-muenster.de>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F319B092-7C60-438C-BD47-E2495B7789F4@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <4B65832E-7BD6-4515-9C09-0C392BC85BC9@westhawk.co.uk> <F1CFE1B1-7F44-403C-8BA7-13293CC4291A@lurchi.franken.de> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C13F489@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/Ddj-gk4kzO8Ub_YkGaDQTF_HdJc>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] [rtcweb] Datachannel Hackathon at IETF 101 ?
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:27:29 -0000

> On 25. Jan 2018, at 19:14, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If the purpose is to test different data channel stacks (in addition to just establishing the SCTP-over-DTLS association), I assume there needs to be some applications that use the data channels?
> 
> It would be nice to have webpage where people could add links to their applications using data channels, so that people can then click :)
Some examples can be found at:
https://github.com/nplab/WebRTC-Data-Channel-Playground

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dispatch [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Tuexen
> Sent: 25 January 2018 19:47
> To: T H Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
> Cc: Felix Weinrank <weinrank@fh-muenster.de>; dispatch@ietf.org; RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [dispatch] [rtcweb] Datachannel Hackathon at IETF 101 ?
> 
>> On 24. Jan 2018, at 12:28, T H Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> There has been talk over on the w3c list about the scarcity and unsuitability of free-standing WebRTC datachannel implementations.
>> 
>> I wonder if this is a suitable target for the IETF 101 hackathon? 
>> 
>> The challenge would be to throw up one or 2 free standing datachannel 
>> implementations based on existing open source with APIs that might suit authors of networked games or SFUs.
>> 
>> Comments? Thoughts?
> We are participating and could use the Firefox WebRTC implementation. We would be able to debug SCTP issues and possibly some issues in the WebRTC implementation of Firefox.
> 
> Best regards
> Michael
>> 
>> T.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch