IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] dispatching draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 11 December 2017 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F87C127444 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:48:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-G3Exfj7z3t for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7661273B1 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f2so42063682qtj.4 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:48:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MvFkKciyTl7PS5DeeX5Vv8SIX5CfTyJPpmQGnUX/YyI=; b=eyF2O+kf1UkM4EDbwFtwVIvZSfL/IUlgwMHQe352mNyjAF3hhy98JxGUy4Y651f04B OvvsdjZB/f0dzXJImP1WR7eQ1BivsbjQSLIiz5+IIA4FiWSvJI0Rh7G0PYtT4mu5DpJk 65wnbYE6z/7P/0LBOpKJ3x7z1qG4M3DpZcNvg6Fh2Bg/lLosh1fyzLyeEORvL1yNvYFm SMJYUULBjsVvBX8A1ltAtOnOAroXu1vzCA2SRhKp0EQA/Hxp7fTK0/kArwJVUBVA20BD D7caHYzLyLZ/ylPxUlilQePVTL1ieyUVJAB24p9IkBCtTh1IEeecoeeZ6rT8EZzT6t+W J3ow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MvFkKciyTl7PS5DeeX5Vv8SIX5CfTyJPpmQGnUX/YyI=; b=TwG9/IzNeWdeKBw4s2ie4AxP/iNdU6iknTatjWeMok+/u+fSN2oMvLZ+ZQT3zjS+UJ hnRZpKNbMZwC9R/odXpWW7lDCORBvWZeHWShwByyxfyZIO5OYUJOGZYYjCXyXKKoRU1r GxPfKx6olSpJZuxgE5SKq+S/d/uMoLsxlYALHe0qW89+5Y3us408Qpg5sUxisy4/EwmQ 7Y7TOJ/k3GOj+au59cObr7M3A0KMt/MjuiPbODZS2Y38m/wPr6X0vng2bKcNHmaTohL0 gaJDB7RMqXDlWrvcO8MqYtoMcro8TV55e/inhZ1rQCLKuyl7yzh8Ui9/ZvLn2HridT3b AJVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLK8GWijpHtMd/vMkfBnhJRy5I0vacqeIf5R3pY66p4xHBrefjh B8OLChAGS3zwqRR/aZR9RgFXZ2ousAK6IiFFhrg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoujB7e5saB2/xaWwT32fnMw44UsjjUGIEbcZ9yCvU82Fw/IttwSDV6lnlB0NkiPmBEj4zrcH4C9I2yCa41/pWs=
X-Received: by 10.55.23.24 with SMTP id i24mr2439396qkh.181.1513025280031; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:48:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.39.72 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:47:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <354C4752-6EEF-4592-9BC6-5BB2F3976AB7@iii.ca>
References: <354C4752-6EEF-4592-9BC6-5BB2F3976AB7@iii.ca>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:47:59 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN6GNa1zBzhtB3UwVEmswoJDZqn_-_9tNPvN5h5FyjrzJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11458d945a5127056016a6bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/FOfjqjNLE55ezDJwdronAUmXIt4>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] dispatching draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:48:03 -0000

As an individual, I have a slight preference for a mini WG as I think that
would make it easier for this to get on the radar of security folks before
it goes through IETF LC.  The whole notion of a mini WG was to provide a
lightweight process for work that might be of a bit broader interest than
other drafts we have AD sponsored in the past that are of more interest to
a narrower group (e.g., 3GPP specific docs).

And, yeah, I know that we likely have the most expert people in IETF
working on this, but in the spirit of transparency I don't necessarily
think that's the highest priority factor when we determine how to dispatch
work items.

Regards,
Mary.

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

>
> From all the discussions so far, it seems the most logical path for this
> draft is AD sponsor. If anyone has any strong objections to this draft
> being AD sponsored, please let us know by Dec 14.
>
> Thanks, Cullen <with my co-chair hat on>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email