Re: [dispatch] Cutoff for 110?

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

I'd interpret the current situation being 'no deadlines' as well.

If so, that's a good outcome; I always found the seeming rigidity* of the DISPATCH process distinctly unwelcoming, especially in a group that's very likely to be someone's first experience of the IETF.

Regardless of whether there are deadlines or not, I think DISPATCH has a duty to clearly document and publicise its processes, expectations and norms. Expecting them to find RFC7957 is *not* adequate.

Cheers,


* I know that there was supposed to be flexibility in the dates, etc., but that was less than clear unless you were an 'insider.'



> On 19 Jan 2021, at 8:17 am, Mary Barnes <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> That's because no one has updated the wiki since I was removed as a co-chair.  Personally, I found it extremely helpful to have the dates there and to keep up with how work items were dispatched since names of activities change.  But, that's for the new chairs to decide if they want to spend the time on it (I did it as part of pre- and post- meeting activities).
> 
> As far as IETF-110 dates, I had expected to find them at least in the IETF-109 chair slides, but they're not there either. 
> 
> So, I guess there are no deadlines other than the draft deadline this time :)
> 
> Regards,
> Mary. 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 9:55 PM Martin Thomson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> I'm looking at the wiki and its very much out of date.  Based on the one example of the dates in the Wiki, the dates might have passed already, but I haven't seen any notices to the list.  Where are we at?
> 
> (Answer to the obvious question: I'm working on something with others, but it's not quite ready yet.)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/