[dispatch] Recommendation of WG for LDAP Additional syntaxes
Carl Eric Codere <carl.codere@optimasc.com> Wed, 05 February 2025 13:43 UTC
Return-Path: <carl.codere@optimasc.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2104C18DBB4 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 05:43:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=optimasc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dT3s1LoV8Xg for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 05:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from optimasc.com (unknown [184.107.187.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E78C14F6F3 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 05:43:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=optimasc.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+6fKSezN9045tQoxU7mPSi0e0TonKJaKuiuwbUNMpxI=; b=A0NB7Q0L/npUitUfBUg9AxOfYX neIy3tF4BgcQ4IE6Yzf8qWFyj+eZmAWtkl8KNPVRgwIjEZksrqwWIJblZclsuA+bpPI2QiBW4EIZM pNLtiXY1zbhnXYJDthOAH6NBfCUOd6t/F/Owbve7gC5wB2oDux+E9TOI8OBCNxjJPp9Q12blMHWuc ZqHq8ulBeUUuNQu5vcCS/gJWuJfh88zCEamWJ23U5lmSvAiomXEzFuXpyJdAZDyyh8QgWcZDTfKPY Y4rbg8Re7gkNu1plm2ERtICjrldJHWdMziDUJyfdtS3m2t6rdfFc9cGYismQpRFuZAMjFMdvEAdXd pMOwAH7g==;
Received: from [58.96.255.154] (port=2430 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by mtl200.greengeeks.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from <carl.codere@optimasc.com>) id 1tffhA-00000001VCT-0ScH for dispatch@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 13:43:53 +0000
To: dispatch@ietf.org
From: Carl Eric Codere <carl.codere@optimasc.com>
Message-ID: <9f1d66b8-3c54-30a4-9a18-66794e802061@optimasc.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 21:43:49 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------98C00FFBEE3277A0236971CB"
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mtl200.greengeeks.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - optimasc.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: mtl200.greengeeks.net: authenticated_id: carl.codere@optimasc.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: mtl200.greengeeks.net: carl.codere@optimasc.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-ID-Hash: 3NQZETRS6SM7QMEO6AXPHJR7VMFJLPN3
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3NQZETRS6SM7QMEO6AXPHJR7VMFJLPN3
X-MailFrom: carl.codere@optimasc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dispatch.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dispatch] Recommendation of WG for LDAP Additional syntaxes
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/GUmeKaxDG7s1pCTnfKbiVr6liMY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dispatch-leave@ietf.org>
Greetings,
I have submitted a new I-D as an independent submission
to the RFC Editor, and the RFC editor has recommended to actually see if
the I-D could go into the standardization track through the IETF instead.
I am not sure if this email list is the correct one or not.. Please
correct me if my approach is wrong.
A summary of my submission:
* /The file name of the published Internet-Draft /:
draft-codere-ldapsyntax (current version: draft-codere-ldapsyntax-01)
* /An assertion that no IANA allocation in the document requires IETF
Review or Standards Action/: According to IETF RFC 4520 for syntax
definition registrations, there are no expert group review required,
except that the description of the syntaxes should be available so
they can be added by IANA.
* /A statement describing the purpose: /There are missing LDAP Syntax
definitions in the original IETF RFC 4517 standard that may limit
the scope of usage for certain types of LDAP applications. The
objective is to register additional LDAP syntaxes so that they can
be used. To ensure that these additional LDAP syntax definitions are
widely available and not lost, decision was made to publish them as
an I-D.
Should this internet draft be considered for an IETF WG/discussion or
should i confirm the submission to the Independent stream?
Thanks for taking into consideration my email,
Regards
Carl Eric Codere
- [dispatch] Recommendation of WG for LDAP Addition… Carl Eric Codere