Re: [dispatch] Updated PERC Charter proposal

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Mon, 01 June 2015 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870541A9129 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 02:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Ld3NEqy3s3R for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 02:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0B41A912C for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 02:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79b66d000001131-ac-556c2a453530
Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B5.A7.04401.54A2C655; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:47:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:47:48 +0200
Message-ID: <556C2A44.8010805@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:47:48 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
References: <CAHBDyN6BeyL-wh_=t7jN+tfhTTnZK0uTBra-F7MR11x9eFkGpg@mail.gmail.com> <D188F24E.14D48%goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com> <55683230.3020600@ericsson.com> <CAHBDyN68U=KiyM8aTzbmmFzN9cZJ_MgZs00VPCODyufMn=JpUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN68U=KiyM8aTzbmmFzN9cZJ_MgZs00VPCODyufMn=JpUA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra6rVk6owcEHshaHFl9itZjfeZrd YumkBawWn/fvZ3Zg8WhZ1cvssXPWXXaPJUt+MnnM2vmEJYAlissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj3aK5 7AVtShXz+p+xNDAekuhi5OCQEDCRWPrbqIuRE8gUk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAUUaJCdt2MIMkhASW MUosXlEBYvMKaEvcbTwDFmcRUJHY1XOdCcRmE7CQuPmjkQ3EFhWIkpj6eB0LRL2gxMmZT8Bs EQEdiW+f34LVMAtsYpQ4vRlsprCAqcSSnT+gFj9llNh/Zgk7SIJTIFCiYdVOdogGC4mZ888z QtjyEs1bZ0Mdpy3R0NTBOoFRcBaSfbOQtMxC0rKAkXkVo2hxanFSbrqRsV5qUWZycXF+nl5e askmRmBYH9zyW3UH4+U3jocYBTgYlXh4F+zJDhViTSwrrsw9xCjNwaIkzuvZFRIqJJCeWJKa nZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgbH1C+OlNXf28jS+XMpQs2oP68Jpr9cmG9Y3dU/4p/rjwcIX UpKzCqoLF133FeBgM/5q92AZ27vPHHMlvc/aLwj5W6T+49P0deGfFh/MkJvqzdARISpQ+afw 7jfOnc+OrP1xVCT1i/hHL67A13slAtv4F1zY9lzTd83pLqP5Dbw7bzOG+Z2N+h+nxFKckWio xVxUnAgAYAlD60wCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/HR2_9GsbFNe4Wcga2z5dFdu2a18>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Updated PERC Charter proposal
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:47:53 -0000

Hi,

I have edited the proposed change into the Google Doc. Any more feedback 
on this?

Cheers

Magnus

Mary Barnes skrev den 2015-05-29 16:53:
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Magnus Westerlund
> <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com <mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I hope others can comment on this also.
>
>     Göran Eriksson AP skrev den 2015-05-25 17:10:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I have some minor comments concerning the meaning of ³SIP² and
>         ³WebRTC²
>         endpoints.
>
>         Sorry for the late response and for top-posting but it became a
>         bit messy
>         to add inline:
>
>         1. The link to
>         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview/ did
>         not work?
>
>
>     It works fine for me.
>
>         2. The text uses ³SIP² and ³WebRTC² to describe the different
>         kind of
>         end-points that are in scope.
>              W3C WebRTC WG recognises the fact that the WebRTC end
>         points can be
>         browser end points
>              (browser + web (client portion of) web app) or native
>         WebRTC (or rather
>         rtcweb) clients and both are in scope for the W3C WG.
>              The browser endpoint trust model is different from that of
>         native
>         clients and it is also evolving.
>              I think that clarity in how different endpoints trust model and
>         security framework look like and different is beneficial for
>         several of
>         the deliverables, notably 2,3 and 5.
>
>
>     The use of WebRTC endpoints where deliberate by my and intended to
>     cover not only browsers but anything meeting the WebRTC endpoint
>     definition. So the question, does this need to be made more explicit
>     in the charter?
>
> [MB] I think this is fine as is in the charter - certainly it needs to
> be clear in the deliverables but that's a detail we can deal with there.
> [/MB]
>
>
>
>
>         3. The charter says it will ³notify² W3C WebRTC about this
>         activity; what
>         do the WG expect to get back and why not Œcoordinate¹? And are
>         there other
>         W3C WG¹s that are relevant?
>
>
>     I think the expectation is that in the end W3C and likely RTCWEB WG
>     agrees to integrate the PERC solution into their specifications so
>     that one can actually use it with WebRTC. In intermediate step I
>     think it will be a question of notifying for example when there
>     exist a proposed blue-print for integration. This may be an example
>     of where coordinate might be needed.
>
>     I could see that we could change the last sentence in the
>     collaboration part from:
>     "We will notify AVTCore, CLUE, MMUSIC, RTCWEB, SIPREC, W3C WebRTC,
>     and other related groups about this work."
>
>     to
>     "We will notify, and when needed coordinate with, AVTCore, CLUE,
>     MMUSIC, RTCWEB, SIPREC, W3C WebRTC, and other related groups about
>     this work."
>
>     Opinions?
>
> [MB] I think the suggested change is fine. [/MB]
>
>
>     Cheers
>
>     Magnus Westerlund
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Ericsson AB                 | Phone +46 10 7148287
>     <tel:%2B46%2010%207148287>
>     Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
>     <tel:%2B46%2073%200949079>
>     SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
>     <mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------