Re: [dispatch] IETF 113 - do you have something for DISPATCH?

[Kirsty Paine <[e-mail]>]

Hi Anton,

I'm sorry to hear your perception of the IETF to date is that it suppresses
grassroots initiatives. DISPATCH is here to help navigate options for new
work, explain some of the ways to move work forward, and can be
particularly welcoming for those newer to, or less familiar with, the IETF.

Patrick and I (dispatch co-chairs) will reach out to you separately, to
avoid list noise, about your options to progress your drafts.

Kirsty


On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:10 AM Anton Tveretin <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Kirsty,
> I wrote two I-Ds, namely, draft-tveretin-dispatch-l2tp-sdp-02 and
> draft-tveretin-dispatch-remote-03, but I did not update them for a while
> (almost 5 years). I don't see any way to proceed with them. Is there any
> way? Is an implementation the right way? I do not see this as the intended
> approach to standartization.
> I perceive the position of the IETF - and DISPATCH in particular - to
> suppress any grassroots initiative. I remember the story behind Dmitry
> Tyurin's HTML 6.0.
> Also, I started SIP 2.5, but I never made it into an I-D.
> Sincerely yours,
> Anton Tveretin
>