Re: [dispatch] A WG for HTTP API Building Blocks

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 15 July 2020 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502EE3A087C for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=MlfHtDyM; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ikUGeNbK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hK1g6ppxAeOi for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B47C3A087B for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CB25C0095; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:32:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=V myv5B6Siao6g1XtpU/OiAUQ5Cw/8yeUPafGKmaW5BQ=; b=MlfHtDyMDwbgGe7qa hPlsu79bFmU1PC/qQiWtwCP7cV82j3G+st8OtSNKbGempVydlB+dqVzul4LFjAzF sxMoYy9elC2Ap5CDJPHjy8iPAuHhFaJMsokEe/eAJcz8264nD/zxJ54A1+Cz0DE3 Tp1eCYot5VV9YvdDsqTjtYtSNIkVW6gSeMo47kSQbuU5U0tTm4UPQol5uKhQR8qs 3Q3U58v6kIyzcMzaPj1wxnHOK3ggMF+1d1hPJGWgnaMYP5jFDbB1HZcUz0lCu1fu T/ZREmNlxtuso7pGCgitGVGqbSPnPIUrlp2hkDLBMarHCsfC3nZoKmXP8DitzYWM P0nBA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Vmyv5B6Siao6g1XtpU/OiAUQ5Cw/8yeUPafGKmaW5 BQ=; b=ikUGeNbKBe5GWNDmTdW/kWJ7iJnkcjt7GqLvQLRBB5PJP4PwmNdrb0Sec v5+VuVVQp6gnW9Ax3IdBsT/sp5KpvdgyBnxZEze6btbXatrWcy5cjftOuzIdsYt2 kFQuR1ODNkz6m9gj58pIBJKtE0R5UdD5GfXwuVZUiAY+/L9/6l/AfQf/4+1QjbW7 +tYR6j9fGupuF5M82W8MhMXZ+fKJ0guCPIB+fE+dua9337akyaa6/0nGwUowck0d Bxb2IDwslUzMjfiKfNJ1DLX9MQoGPXnSEddBxfqVdzJjJ5Siy3qv9ztMeI4hmNaH L0cYlMwrNe0wVO0h16wIZZttBo8vw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ggUPX161B00NxAYz3_VpVrF3jBsXNQTKNMJieoLXuPhr252WnW7bdQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrfedvgdejudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeduvdeljeegtefhveekhfdtveekleevkeefgeeludeihfdugedvieeuffdttdfh necuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduudelrd dujedrudehkedrvdehudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgr ihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ggUPXy7J2LckzBvS6pebbzjVP906GodF_CZmEwIQnuUZKuHK23M__A> <xmx:ggUPX8dU1V0iuycy6HCN07IlI-UhyPLRykEyLeGTcYa_MVN9563e7w> <xmx:ggUPX-JOV5zUchEC68mCtm-QTMhqPWNdmI8R7zCSzfWOLTJvRcgQ-Q> <xmx:gwUPX3iUQEFIKoVIQhbCemKwOD-ZYEFRbYYJS39FSeyEDMxmK2MuWQ>
Received: from marks-air.mnot.net (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 907623280066; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <56558cd0-b1e1-9be1-a07e-c4d62c133de9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:32:45 +1000
Cc: DISPATCH WG <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F504D33E-40B3-42A1-95BE-BAF300680652@mnot.net>
References: <111A89F4-CBD6-4C63-A45A-C7458E7413FF@mnot.net> <CAHBDyN7BGsBJ4=+boBAAP5Z+ZT+pFfQ-iJtSa7qHNTP_bGyXeQ@mail.gmail.com> <7414026C-4726-4C8E-8C9C-60A81F5456B5@brianrosen.net> <506832AD-0C3C-43AA-B5A7-EB5E80A2A112@mnot.net> <56558cd0-b1e1-9be1-a07e-c4d62c133de9@gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/Jwe200U_TMHtiiH-o5XoroKR4-g>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] A WG for HTTP API Building Blocks
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:32:54 -0000

FYI:
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00

Cheers,


> On 15 Jul 2020, at 5:40 pm, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> A long time source of frustration has been and still is the case of "Signed HTTP Requests".
> The limited progress in this space have forced other parties to step in, more recently including ETSI with Open Banking as initial target.
> FWIW, I'm personally working on such a scheme that facilitate serialization which in turn enables counter-signing.  It is based on RFC 8785.
> 
> thanx,
> Anders

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/