Re: [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (distinguish between forwarded and otherwise wrapped messages)
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 02 October 2020 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A4F3A113F for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=s8XaUxmZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Ag23f6yG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QpG3tzuid_3w for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918273A1138 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24126 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2020 17:19:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5e3c.5f77612f.k2010; bh=JXNGNeeqYin9yvYUB60J/A82F3SIBztKMt6D6LsqgWk=; b=s8XaUxmZfbqR1GIt9VlIODMEtMPb4F0TYgRzOHdcCSccnDJDFLRo70dHV6NmU5MepFHKx6AQDrrJcBtOvS4SEbDxAXKswNEgq0re1wdygH0PMAyXMyS1LEpAzNYLIkJpAnUp98v+wvVWCuDeTtjkpTddbIqNpbPK6t6HvA7urIPiAoq6gaXXmd0/llqwm50HEXz+slLaqQptK6VGRP4ou5fjO5LhYrhCZEpN1olFVUi+GZ/i80tS9BnpKEWNgob6zBOViNC4CEGu9/olET4+9+KX5cV6fxgUGPEhcLoTHx7B9ySYfcmmfRJSAEIsj7aU4/T5Hmuvl6RasbJ8KlGs6Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5e3c.5f77612f.k2010; bh=JXNGNeeqYin9yvYUB60J/A82F3SIBztKMt6D6LsqgWk=; b=Ag23f6yG0uVonOchdHN1Up9iB6uQ7unztYwcrvAIAGIkdQkq80c3vxZOlW5w3APmin6YonJ439uh5VwjqOopEYt+uFf+ybUgSd8v2avkiG5VPwmfgDANPomaE+CZCcLJX8Sg2f4KtFMuSf8tnH2bYGCEcMs7VXlYiJHbVmXbuF+MeCJA5X9Ha7abPHYOfZDM3aJo8s8N2+7x2JYpHiMoHI8yYMFyXK7lP55bVF4CjO6wQ+TSLfI71lx+0C194HOQrliYA6e+Mg7n6kdtZoQu8ncFZ+8RQVIlR/dWikkgiOrhbZNzlTTb3Rk4RerdVCcMGjYKd9UOGTxCTcWpkuIQiA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 02 Oct 2020 17:19:42 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7223822D65C8; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:19:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:19:42 -0400
Message-Id: <20201002171942.7223822D65C8@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dispatch@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010021533240.55994@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/KUASXfSnU_uTnaNuBknfzBoUHIg>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (distinguish between forwarded and otherwise wrapped messages)
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:19:55 -0000
In article <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010021533240.55994@softronics.hoeneisen.ch> you write: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-melnikov-iana-reg-forwarded-00 > >This I-D suggests a new Content-Type Header Field Parameter "forwarded": >If set to "yes", the contained message was forwarded; if set to "no", the >message was "wrapped" for signature/encryption with Header Protection. >email message is transported in the Body part of another email message and >such a Parameter may be helpful, such as: ... >1) Is it helpful/useful/needed to enhance such a Parameter for these > additional cases? Probably not. Since a receiving system cannot trust senders to accurately label the messages, it's hard to see what they would do with the labels. I looked at the draft and while I have my doubts about how useful it will be, since there are implementations it seems at worst harmless. R's, John
- [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (disting… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (dis… John Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (dis… worley
- Re: [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (dis… John Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (dis… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [dispatch] Improve UX in Encrypted Email (dis… Bernie Hoeneisen