IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] New Version Notification - draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-04.txt

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Thu, 15 October 2020 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809D63A02BC for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ocgu7ml7eO_5 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C598F3A010A for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw01.schlund.de ([10.72.72.47]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus004 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N5VsU-1kMzxv06ag-016sxL; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:26:37 +0200
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:26:36 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@gmail.com>, Dispatch WG <dispatch@ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <894177016.33315.1602793596709@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCh=BAMCm4-9HnSVDhW7qgzRJS6j+Q-LvVQ+P3GwYN3mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <160278762498.6279.12834691771462136672@ietfa.amsl.com> <695687617.30027.1602790280802@email.ionos.com> <CA+9kkMCh=BAMCm4-9HnSVDhW7qgzRJS6j+Q-LvVQ+P3GwYN3mg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev23
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:NTprg9RD5cSIillPNB2HoR3jqxfPXc0+hiDldtJOLUvj6w/Lk16 h6Jtph4dtn9gUjWP8ISV1z6Qy1/e7rWkpoJN8KlF8gOasZbI6DqkrOJ0VAE6y6isCu5NdhY GFBroCQT3Qc65CFD+p/QfgTY4C903jQSadQTRBpBr9+MgAlnxmhnZo4N3JCAOubwvzILSJa 5QWhPkjcL71vonmEJsP6A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:jg91ibTbEZI=:rLB60r8jq3lgx/hVntYjM1 i2kJobr//gWYd9tIv5Hi/K//z/SWrHDukUlhBFDcaIp/cApjh76L4s5VDjyumiOOvJ+3vnGK9 7CYSPl7/2V7qwH43RxvGvzqmW+20/9SYay1h9icQrMvvfCGuDTGDE9U640XUz6/F/Xtp9rvqS DKSZyE9Cqont/9ayoLARNQXI2vmnvMXqKXC40V5/BTaXGE23PYGTtqmICskp/kVZtY9uzbYvv 8tSpV0y5RRO+u8qOJPG4T+H1ctq0tiFf69CigjfVh7qQm/zBevjMeXMNgOYw1H/3pu4H8rL1r EIyVgceBb07ZpOmPYdPjKIymSvQv48e22WlQjRc4yXCo8TDhSI5htVYK0zKOj3M4DToeIilhW nOmnEJp3brriFGM4vnA4N6d5uUatymzEQUqEckhNX3BaS0YZNssxVBCS4NC1SnfnHyz04XHC+ SeujzxUPfQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/PqL1zz0F7C_QbS8DGpsVlGrB5vI>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] New Version Notification - draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 20:26:41 -0000

Ted,
These changes were already proposed during the last call of your update but the Shepard did not do anything about them.  So I don't understand where you are coming from.

Tim

On 10/15/2020 4:18 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:


Hi Timothy,

The two small changes done for this version were to respond to IESG comments which sought to improve the clarity of the existing proposal; they did not introduce new elements to the proposal in the document.  I think your comments propose a much more significant change, and document updates post-IESG processing is not the time for that type of change.  If you wish to see other changes, I suggest you propose them in a new document.

regards,

Ted Hardie

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:33 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
I would like to see the following changes made to this version (-04) because it does not specify what will be exactly will be reviewed:

2. Updated Requirements
This document removes and replaces the normative requirements from sections 3.1.1
and section 3.1.2 of RFC3405 with:
The registration of a NAPTR record for a URI scheme MUST NOT precede registration of that scheme.  IANA will review the request against for
  1. correctness and technical soundness (eg. valid databases, service parameters etc.) and
  2. consistency with the published URI resolution application specification [RFC3404], and
  3. to ensure that the NAPTR record for a DNS-based URI does not delegate resolution of the URI to a party other than the holder of the DNS name. This last rule is to insure that a given URI's resolution hint doesn't hijack (inadvertently or otherwise) network traffic for a given domain.

3. IANA Considerations

This update does not change the IANA submission procedure in Section 5 of RFC 3405.


_______________________________________________
dispatch mailing list
_______________________________________________
dispatch mailing list
dispatch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch" rel="noopener nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status