Re: [dispatch] Plan to Submit a Proposal for Opportunistic SRTP
Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Tue, 22 September 2015 16:27 UTC
Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F8D1B2BE0 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 18.001
X-Spam-Level: ******************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=18.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL=20] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9au8jiqp_-VL for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB721B2B6D for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkao3 with SMTP id o3so10041894vka.2 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=107icJMMZBUxBUR6hWlg9NLsxy6YJSgG/TBnjdLKT4Q=; b=jDLmoioGvlx0jBkMe3VTKU5yRKzp9mF5FHT02UUFhHkaQ3Fqx2mKyKW+TrNM2H50aA ykiWSwQCMnA8uKxYBkoQo3lQuXc4G2awE8A2jlb5kS6tW0aBQBd4Wfd+fdLzbGD6WbXG DItHwuq6VDgkVNcfFTgGQA5oJrkCUu7iKhYAbTaHK5/6kwCTuMCmtceyPAYIVFIWq+xi l2+VkXCl4Im8s44tIrGLP9tnBm5ldpnfGHeNLAsr1rfKQM0hav5QO67CuMAfBxuDa3Yo ET6QlkwezDZRqgDd5Txbhi6ROdnViSYpCVs7h/LjrKL/V427nd0moxsZ+32Rdxunv0ZD vs3w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.2.205 with SMTP id 196mr18043588vkc.123.1442939238535; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.8.7 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56017B78.8732.31D9DCBE@fas_vm.surguttel.ru>
References: <56017B78.8732.31D9DCBE@fas_vm.surguttel.ru>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:27:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKhHsXFJ=rxVuH2Tub0rfPDHmVnr8LpdrfgAw8M+t92G7KaLeg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Anton Tveretin <fas_vm@surguttel.ru>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c01300bedaec05205878c0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/RxlO-Y4ebQ29dHU4NPRHryRHVlQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:44:13 -0700
Cc: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Plan to Submit a Proposal for Opportunistic SRTP
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:27:20 -0000
Hi Anton, Glad you support the idea. The approach described in draft-johnston-dispatch-osrtp is not identical to that in draft-kaplan-mmusic-best-effort-srtp. In the next version, we'll include a section that discusses the differences. The differences relate to the fact that OSRTP is based on and compliant with Opportunistic Security defined in RFC 7435, while draft-kaplan-mmusic-best-effort-srtp used something we used to call "best effort SRTP" which predates OS by many years. The other draft also has lots of historical background and discussions of alternate approaches. We could decide to publish that information if we move forward with OSRTP, but we thought it useful to leave it out in the initial versions of OSRTP to show that the proposed approach is very simple with just a few normative statements needed. - Alan - On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Anton Tveretin <fas_vm@surguttel.ru> wrote: > I fully support the idea. But this I-D seems to be a little more than a > reference to > draft-kaplan-mmusic-best-effort-srtp-01... > > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch >
- [dispatch] Plan to Submit a Proposal for Opportun… Alan Johnston
- Re: [dispatch] Plan to Submit a Proposal for Oppo… Anton Tveretin
- Re: [dispatch] Plan to Submit a Proposal for Oppo… Alan Johnston
- Re: [dispatch] Plan to Submit a Proposal for Oppo… Alan Johnston