IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD58D129514 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cbgDF4rxUFhH for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E0E12942F for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id d191so37205483ywe.2 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FDMIIaHF1eTTb+YsIBV9oOT+KF8XavdRNIU7N51hhI4=; b=MtwXnYZK62wpQ1DVfvF8I75zpYolrypAZg8xLppTa62BmnpCFHP6jwfUHH0p2JbnX5 5ycEjsk/mDB84z/PDF2ARr2eP8OyXFPbgGxlNOCLOnOBM8iurfYGYO29+c1MWK2nLaU0 9KV3XJWhMw3P44B5MIaRxOZ2eZrguUSsDFRQOYwhim2LFU+K++qOQMoY5y4ID4e5xyCR jL2DxySY/a9CJLxKQJaUObSQw+2LnM0H/Vl52Cslg1Lf7mcfcrpYI6STzrDyohy+lR8e TFW2U0BfMK694mthGwHsHWyM+X3N2hOkIYEicY5Hz8o4Zwee7zI2TFR2h/7d3yIDm5YT HM8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FDMIIaHF1eTTb+YsIBV9oOT+KF8XavdRNIU7N51hhI4=; b=izOKS2RuMNsqQd47miTnjEF5GOw7VNKT9YW0wDFJI2jj8jwlRxEvQ0JqZqzDRk2OMm xTtBFF3sWuz3hXuuo/glygwWoz1i+fy9JoFz5jO3rz13RFR+Mit+7lPO9KRV+jk89QqK SnKp3NsWwcvdcplPK/TJ2SjWxJ+UDUGhHZ615tZtSv9Ur3R25yyHB0YMhKrjlw9r6QCm qad/uIvr5zS8KZawC+tgOkKcCHLEUVzUE/YULTSbw231GAhvlyYzDVVnSpObg64matBn Iqq5m6kunsheVkT8pdMLLFqW8oamfP4fvbt8Z4LLwc+5ZSXHRv/JQOS488rrefRP0q4k 2Ssw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3XEgloOQJqLPRtv202ipf1ozF+wh879Xtv8CXakGLqqmW3eXUphlh03tM3qOWP2iX03B4y0kVZsgjo8A==
X-Received: by 10.13.240.199 with SMTP id z190mr27069938ywe.125.1491584059015; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.154.210 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704071250510.55219@ary.qy>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703271129060.7578@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org> <CAL0qLwZ9pDcOsooOgrpN9feDywc-+=twNtN4BpvOQ6ny68yLfA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703301431530.8232@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704071233050.55219@ary.qy> <CABcZeBMw+S-O-gX4Yhse+WRQNeV3rR-W4nLCb8KdNf+oBiyMaA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704071250510.55219@ary.qy>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:53:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMN+fsiZ2fj4RRrLBEe8GQx2HB77F0nJ9UUJJ71j4UMig@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c03380cfdb5de054c9679ff"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/WCQhthNjDp4yQzlVWiGmabdu8No>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:54:22 -0000

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:51 AM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> hash of the key in the DNS.  It will limit itself to existing implemented
>>> algorithms and key forms.
>>>
>>
>> Can you clarify "implemented" here? Do you just mean "in wide use by IETF
>> or otherwise"?
>>
>
> That's essentially what I had in mind.  Freely available high quality
> imeplmentations would be nice.
>

The only reason I mentioned this is that one might think that this meant
"implemented in DKIM". Do you think "limit itself to algorithms and
key forms generally in use in the IETF"? would be clearer?

-Ekr


>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email