Re: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-03.txt

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Sat, 15 February 2014 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9467F1A01E7 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:35:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.34, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8KoQ9lK_6VZ for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686531A01CD for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.66.246.94] (unknown [64.104.248.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EE24509B6; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:35:13 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAEqTk6R1bEG2=fr70zLXLC2MxC11b7ekHqZP4S8L_0s+v83DDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 08:42:52 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E0DBCEC4-5380-4899-B837-8121DA368854@iii.ca>
References: <20131213005747.777.34301.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBDyN4tSRO_nYy7_-V4xfmDbF0ZeLJ24_fEOQ1p9Z2BvJyinQ@mail.gmail.com> <97B47463-42D2-4BA9-AC2F-DF8C67702DDC@cisco.com> <52FCE70C.1030608@gmail.com> <CAHBDyN7hySvbiJYnvRXDQ2ZS_FYFDMaODXBDRarE6DhRwC=fHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ag07bPBHzODTWGKFrKE00nO_wiMgRv2GEwUpGCiH25-Xf2Cw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqTk6Reb=29kxeOUyPxAnhkRGqORHRoUchz5=hE4UNMggDnag@mail.gmail.com> <52FD36A3.1020606@gmail.com> <CAEqTk6R1bEG2=fr70zLXLC2MxC11b7ekHqZP4S8L_0s+v83DDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/XpTW-xtBfkZHQo_y95mVgyHF8vM
Cc: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 23:35:39 -0000

On Feb 14, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net> wrote:

> Because WebSockets is an asynchronous protocol two MSRP peers (that are clients) cannot use MSRP over WebSockets.

Just sort of curios, why can’t this work?