IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Fwd: WGLC: draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-02.txt

Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> Tue, 17 July 2018 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9F012F1A6; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZLegSF7ORRX; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA99127AC2; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id r1-v6so497559pgp.11; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=YQGX9sBLibPSn5cPD54sQzmN+QnGd/WwVsnRz6Yse8g=; b=bGcetcOZbw/fjhRJNoKRfTIvI+lahmSMtOm+rxCA3Ayv6wWR5YZOlx7gYUdgE6KDzm qFSqdQBVJI7O6s1I2u0yR5h3WdDvu/ns0SmBeKv8epJGR5rhfqKeSucqgi7Xuu2FPoSp pHBkJUAhj+WBzGnie1yblO5mE4RZgS+0RWxJYHRQjYLDCVhZKfBJzm0opHANcTP3z9M1 ZsTuws/p8jUqsW91/XM1S7i4lXWrflNuk6UCRj0bHR5D8y/iybFwucpv0sLx6xLn3wnQ 8di4tcxdHtrKVMy0/rLd7gJiJv2EPpHfEqswiVVWo32jR+Z8CE0MCWmOYtQZo36KOCQB O/cQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=YQGX9sBLibPSn5cPD54sQzmN+QnGd/WwVsnRz6Yse8g=; b=dIgYJQXpgk4k36Aqa+QsWCBawlTu26MSPvksGU4GmKVYl8ZcMPfXL197VFhxh1/gCX Krh87sA0q+z7z3hzi3uaG0u8Kueh2NmyjdJ+vKgLug/BURg2BCYJM444tz/IbUA+gVW+ KG6zJMbfPU+uO6oYsEBYd7E2wsmK+IL88CzZ09VGKzu6gRJPiDBvrS1LVQJN4ZpB0bcD hXGRre9uktVmmqi4EoSDXxkUxk2sWNBrMjc/dytut/+PVYG7UPJyDrXv0OY/DdvH/Jnv 8UojmTFY4O2Cd7Wh6pLzb+LbgxF4m4iaBiEBqGwA3r5VSAcVgzMxde5kuszLf8ZmXtWJ VksA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFYiwnHHW9NZ0vPVSCRq+uGcJCzhF+C/JXhMheqn6PVjktWlUhN WS8XTT0iioXIaSYzVR35rf4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpckA/cBnA+rNOUGDqorbYAvmolakiF205VsKxZrcuDvhZSs93BN2/P1vU/EvavezpuTn0FDcQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6203:: with SMTP id d3-v6mr1789973pgv.420.1531836938874; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TVPC (c-24-6-174-39.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.174.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5-v6sm3481411pgn.73.2018.07.17.07.15.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
X-Google-Original-From: "Larry Masinter" <lmm@acm.org>
To: 'Martin Thomson' <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, 'Bradley Meck' <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Cc: 'DISPATCH' <dispatch@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs@ietf.org
References: <CAHBDyN5kB=yi_eFty2hRO4LpadKrSSY0KY-BAS2447Y84pPoWg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXEbYtc7VKisvyTEAiTbteQPT=gXF9HY=VgeSrSCo7FCg@mail.gmail.com> <CANnEKUaUuRQ5NrLafcg_BtVKTdf+NNgDUEfn0h2oWh4R1F6+xw@mail.gmail.com> <CANnEKUbBY4XsFsR_-zP1v_PJnav6mhtFUBC5YOGt1OrzNNSzew@mail.gmail.com>, <CABkgnnWnhoW8Om9DKgiTXMcC466d9y_4zDy0newrb5LFWqO47Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWnhoW8Om9DKgiTXMcC466d9y_4zDy0newrb5LFWqO47Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:15:36 -0700
Message-ID: <000001d41dd8$a2ad12e0$e80738a0$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHUGjwIgZSPI+/PLkuVU40cEzx4fKSTcM7a
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/YB4zwINenVoVwV-14BPARUThQBE>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Fwd: WGLC: draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:15:41 -0000

➢ Only `text/javascript` is not obsolete per https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/scripting.html#scriptingLanguages 

I wonder about the utility of newly registering (or updating the registration) of types that are obsolete.
If there’s significant deployment of names that new implementations need to be aware of, then ‘obsolete’ isn’t the right status; if not, then who would use the new, but obsolete, definition?

Larry
http://LarryMasinter.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email